deeds wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:43 am
Conclusion : as soon as this guy asks you a question, run away or prepare to be insulted !
Sorry for the delay...but I was busy in latest days )
About many of your comments,
Sad really that you are STILL trying to show
Something like that 'Sedat' is bad, wrong...
Where Deeds or other/s is/are right, good...))
And sure, all of you are great, faultless, very kind etc.
Frankly it seems on comments, but what about in reality??
And as usual, instead of comments, papers etc...I say:
We need a very good calculation tool..and I wonder
Then who will be right and who will be wrong ?)
On other hand, it is perfectly clear also that:
You missed to publish your 1st and all rest attacks...
Which were as underestimating my work, name etc.
And all these words were NOT as 'grammar' mistakes!
All this story was clear: destroying SCCT, thanks again!
And I assume that even 10 years old boy will understand...
What I can say more,
I did not start as 'FIRSTLY' all this bad story...!
After all, I am human (in reality) not as ROBOT !)
And I have FEELINGS... so what did you expect ??
To be in silence?..SORRY...sure I am not going to
Publish all of yours attacks, comments, links etc. but
No doubt that you FIRSTLY started to call Me as LIAR...
And NOT only in OpenChess, plus in Outskirts forum too!
It's true also that your bad words are already removed by
Outskirts mods..but, it's clear about who started as firstly:
http://outskirts.altervista.org/forum/v ... 8&start=10
Btw, sure after all,
I can't force you to be in GOOD friendship..but if nothing else
Let's PEACE to be as WINNER...Let's GOOD to be as WINNER!!
Sure to be archived PEACE..it's required understanding for sure!
And I hope that you have...If not... again it will be sad indeed..
But I can live with that...
Actually if all this story was in a friendly way..such as firstly
You said as 'Hello-Thanks-Congrats etc. in other words,
Were as so hard to use some of these kind words (in parallel too) ?
In other words, do you think that
Only with accusing, blaming Me etc. you'll gain something?
If so..believe Me...you are completely in W-R-O-N-G way !!
Meanwhile, would not be MUCH boring too ?
If we will talk again over these old issues?
Such as, you told Me firstly as liar, idiot etc...
And let's move on!! let's talk about new better ideas!
Let's talk about your new Deeds opening book etc.
Otherwise, if we will start blaming each other..e.g
This story will be never ending process and mostly of our
Valuable time will be just waste of time...e.g such as
I shared as StockfishMZ.exp (instead of Eman exp etc.)
Btw, even if I'd shared as Eman exp, then I wonder too,
What would be changed? listen, I gain nothing, zero..
Really sometimes I have difficulties to understand you!
If still not so clear, I realized to share simply
As it is..used/shared as default, no more no less!
But calling Me for all these actions: as liar...and
Via opening fake threads, attacks etc. like this thread..
Will be interesting for some members, but be sure in that:
It''!s as very bad choice, way..but do not forget..in same time:
The life is like a boomerang, whatever you throw out,
There will always return to your address...!!
One thing more, (in your latest new recent thread)
How to take an incompetent book's maker for a jerk ?
I see also that you are STILL attacking... sad again.. actually
I stated many times that and I offered a help to you...
(Btw, 'f4' openings are not as main reason...just saying...)
But you refused unfortunately...sure I do not force you
Regarding to how to create a better, stronger Deeds book..
But I think that it is worth to give a try...because via special
Tuning...there is strill BIG chances to create better books
Even via current used database...and I and I thankful to
You plus all entries as well......but this is also true that
As 1st try (about Depth4_Deeds), we can not expect much...
Actually you may create by yourself a newer stronger book,
Or the creation method will be even better choice..e.g to be
Done by other well-experienced, competent in book making...
But remember also that, (about I'm incompetent author or not...)
I'd give so many many examples, but due to no free time, just one:
A few months ago (in B/N CS XIII), my created 3753-55 book is one
https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... t-bn-cs-13
Of Top LEADING books and why 3753-55 is managed to be performed as
One of highest, best ranks??..if not clear: this Top book is based
On very strong books openings, where these lines proved in BN X too!
Btw, my creation method is used same for Depth4_Deeds and 3753-55
Exc. the main difference between both mentioned books is that:
They are not based and tuned to use same openings...that's all!
And let's assume that all of you are 100% right,
And in same time, I am totally wrong...but then it's
Coming a very simple question, if my tours,
Testings (SCCT's data) are not correct etc. ?!
If so...Is there any such proving evidence...?
Meanwhile..what about other (NON-SCCT) results?
Can you share such valid and quality rating/s ?)
I asked before...but so far I could not see...
Forget everything..as usual, after my tour ideas..
Many chess friends are starting to gain...and
If I caused to this ..again how happy I'm...!)
Meanwhile, what about your Book vs Exp tests?
You claim such as 50-100 Elo difference...??
Are you sure? but let's say under serious and
Optimal conditions? you may know or not..
Many of us are not interested in testings
Via weak, handicapped openings...because via
Such lines are easy to see much Elo differences..
If still no so clear:
Let's run under serious tour cond, such as via strong
Openings..Blitz TC or even Papid would be better...
And then let's see there will be 100 Elo diff. or not...
By the way, another new, but just a great idea is born,
If you believe that Depth4 exp is stronger about 100 Elo
Than latest SF dev. etc then to validate your test results etc.
Since in your eyes, SCCT is not valid in testings etc. then
You can share your Depth Exp to trusted third party testers...
Such as CEGT, CCRL, FCP, FGRL, SPCC, SSDF etc. you may know,
These TDs are as one of most best, experienced in Ratings!
And meanwhile...if I am not wrong...
Many of above TDs are NOT so interested in private engines!
But I think it is worth to giving a try....what you will loose ?
Thanks for reading too !)
As long as Sedat lies to people about learning engines he will deserve this name and shame 
She must really be bothered 
