Hey Chameleon,deeds wrote: Wed Aug 02, 2023 1:39 pmAs i don't create books, i asked to several book's creators and they explained to me that :Sedat wrote: Otherwise, Depth4_Deeds book would be ranked much higher!book's creator #1 wrote: "the lower the Sedat's depth4_deeds book ranks on his site, the more it demonstrates his incompetence to create books even from quality games."
So then I asked them if they had already sent one of their books to SCCT, here are their answers :book's creator #2 wrote: "Unfortunately yes i did this mistake (2010), i didn't know Sedat enough...
but when i checked my games, i discovered his conditions were like a giant pool of blunders where the winning book is the one that won the lottery !
Never again !"book's creator #3 wrote: "yes like many (2015)... there are too many draws, no interest from startpos in computer chess era..."
I don't asked Conrog about SCCT's conditions but he already said :sourceconrog wrote: I never look after bullet games on 1 thread (1 minute+0.5s games) because those time controls create lots of blunders. For exemple just looking to games losed by OPTIMUS, I found 4 lost games with big blunders...
WOW..WOW..TOO MUCH BULLSHIT COMMENTS )))
On other hand,
I asked you simply such as,
What are Eman's best/optimal eng settings?
If you can't: be calm, stop your bullshit comments..
But as I expected,
You have no clue what are best settings for Eman engine!
LOL..as daily Eman tester, but you are not aware )))
Our Computer Chess is really in danger.. )))
About your rest comments by Book Authors etc.
You are simply as Liar..can you prove it?
Why you hide again real names of book authors?
Maybe because, they are NOT Top book makers or?
Even if so...SCCT's target is not to satisfy all!
No way...it's impossible...btw, if so easy...
Why you can not organize serious tours..?
I'm not referring about book tours, simply
Run serious tours..but with optimal cond.
Such not GUI moves LOL...use best suggested
Author settings...in other words, be sure next
Time to NOT run at handicapped cond. as before ))
Just in case..use available public chess engines..ok ?
Meanwhile,
OPEN YOUR EYES and DON'T TRY TO FOOL again
If not so clear,
Conrog was not meaning about SCCT book tours!
He was referring Goi book tour (as NON-NNUE)
For example, I never ran 1m+0.5s as NON-NNUE
Btw, I use mainly Fritz 14 GUI (if CTG..), so EVEN
if I tr no chance to run at 1m+0.5s...but it seems
You have no clue again... I said you before:
You are NOT even amateur...reality is reality!
Continuing...
Usually I prefer 2m+1s, Ponder ON..that means
Close to 4m+1s PONDER OFF, but if NNUE enabled
Then I prefer mainly 2m+1s, Ponder OFF etc.
About your tools,
Thanks, but I even did not download them...
Reason, I do not need them...correct Me
Please if I am wrong...
And as a last note,
About your learning tests, seasons etc,
I wish you good luck, but believe Me
My beta tests (since 1997, non available online)
Are much more than your available testings !!
And this is also true that,
SCCT eng learning tours are better than yours!
Just one example, you prefer Private exp or
Mainly Private Engines, which are not useful
For overall chess community..just waste of time..
At least for my side..
What I can tell you more ?
Where is Eman's best/optimal settings ?
Btw, are you afraid too much that,
Eman 8.91 will be as looser or what ??
