Page 6 of 12
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:39 pm
by robbolito
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor6x @ 3.2 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 23.33
KNS: 11196
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2010- 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Ivanhoe 52fUS-beta-x64 3190 +7/-6/=37 51.00% 25.5/50
2 Houdini 1.03a x64 8_CPU 3190 +6/-7/=37 49.00% 24.5/50
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:37 pm
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4CPU 960 3.20GHz8x @ 4.005 GHz with 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 24.98
KNS: 11988
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009-10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 IvanHoe 9.52b x64 KLO 3190 +8/-7/=35 51.00% 25.5/50
2 Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU 3190 +7/-8/=35 49.00% 24.5/50
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:43 am
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009-10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 IvanHoe T0.2.x64 3190 +6/-5/=19 51.67% 15.5/30
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3190 +5/-6/=19 48.33% 14.5/30
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:06 pm
by JackStraw
Testing various styles of IH 52eU vs Rybka 4 :
4'2" / i7-940 @ 3.75 / 3 cores ea / ponder off / Vista x64 / F12 / 512 mg / Nunn2 openings /
Rybka 4 default settings + 3-4-5 egtb
Ivanhoe - default except 64 mg pawn hash + Robbobases
1.IH 52eU ( IvanHoe style )............52...........+22,-18,=60
Rybka 4..................................48
2.IH 52eU ( Custom style )............49.5.........+23,-24,=53
Rybka 4..................................50.5
3.IH 52eU ( Firebird style )............45.5.........+20,-29,=51
Rybka 4..................................54.5
4.IH 52eU ( B12c style )................45.5.........+17,-26,=57
Rybka 4..................................54.5
----------------------------------------------
Also , ( same settings )
Ivanhoe T0.1.........................50...............+19,-19.=62
Rybka 4...............................50
Ivanhoe T0.2.........................46.5............+18,-25.=57
Rybka 4...............................53.5
Tom Glenn
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:09 am
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 3.2 GHz8x @ 4.005 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Windows 7 Professional Professional (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmarks:
Speed: 24.89
KNS: 11946
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Hash: 256
Book: Perfect 2010-10 moves
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Ivanhoe 52gU-x64 3190 +8/-3/=9 62.50% 12.5/20
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3190 +3/-8/=9 37.50% 7.5/20
Hi Tom,
it is nice to have a testing companion.
This is new version from Vlad0 and on Qi7 this is very nice score against Rybka 4.
Since the score could indicate very strong engine I will continue testing this version.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:06 pm
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4CPU 960 3.20GHz8x @ 4.005 GHz with 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 24.98
KNS: 11988
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009-10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU 3190 +2/-2/=16 50.00% 10.0/20 100.00
2 Ivanhoe 52gU-x64 3190 +2/-2/=16 50.00% 10.0/20 100.00
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:38 pm
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009-10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:34 pm
by JackStraw
4'2" / i7-940 @ 3.75 / 3 cores ea / ponder off / Vista x64 / F12 / 512 mg / Nunn2 openings /
Rybka 4 default settings + 3-4-5 egtb
Ivanhoe - default except 64 mg pawn hash + Robbobases
Testing : IvanHoe 52gU + High Priority Search on , diff styles
IvanHoe(custom style).............50.5.............+19,-18,=63
Rybka4...............................49.5
IvanHoe(ivanhoe style)............49................+20,-22,=58
Rybka4...............................51
Tom Glenn
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:54 pm
by hyatt
JackStraw wrote:4'2" / i7-940 @ 3.75 / 3 cores ea / ponder off / Vista x64 / F12 / 512 mg / Nunn2 openings /
Rybka 4 default settings + 3-4-5 egtb
Ivanhoe - default except 64 mg pawn hash + Robbobases
Testing : IvanHoe 52gU + High Priority Search on , diff styles
IvanHoe(custom style).............50.5.............+19,-18,=63
Rybka4...............................49.5
IvanHoe(ivanhoe style)............49................+20,-22,=58
Rybka4...............................51
Tom Glenn
I am seriously hoping nobody is drawing conclusions from these kinds of results??? The error bar is huge. There's not enough information to prove which is better, much less by how much.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:33 pm
by robbolito
hyatt wrote:JackStraw wrote:4'2" / i7-940 @ 3.75 / 3 cores ea / ponder off / Vista x64 / F12 / 512 mg / Nunn2 openings /
Rybka 4 default settings + 3-4-5 egtb
Ivanhoe - default except 64 mg pawn hash + Robbobases
Testing : IvanHoe 52gU + High Priority Search on , diff styles
IvanHoe(custom style).............50.5.............+19,-18,=63
Rybka4...............................49.5
IvanHoe(ivanhoe style)............49................+20,-22,=58
Rybka4...............................51
Tom Glenn
I am seriously hoping nobody is drawing conclusions from these kinds of results??? The error bar is huge. There's not enough information to prove which is better, much less by how much.
Dr.Hyatt,
these are just scores from the games played.No conclusions are drawn due to small number of games.Also takes time to collect enough games for some meaningful conclusion.At 10 min. per engine just for 30 games it takes more than 9 hours to finish .But if more people would participate in the testing decent number of games could be collected for reasonable conclusion.
These games are also for fun of testing new versions that are released in attempt to make the engines better.Some are successful and some are not but IH engines are group project that is still going in full swing.