Page 3 of 4
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:57 am
by Martin Thoresen
Thanks, Matthias.
For those that is wondering what is happening during game 14, well:
The webhost is upgrading their storage systems and this started around 00:00 CET and is expected to last 2-3 hours.
Unfortunately there's nothing I can do about that.
In any case, 2 hours have passed now so you can expect the website to be back very soon.
Best,
Martin
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:00 am
by BB+
Just to wrap up the "Rybka poor time-management" story, Houdini managed to win that game.
As one commenter put it, top-level chess doesn't start until move 100 these days.

There's currently a web-hosting break, so I can't look at the full data from the TCEC website. My recollection is that Rybka was down to increments (30 seconds) more-or-less, while Houdini had maybe 5 extra minutes. It looks like the f5-push just became more-and-more feasible, and Black cracked (moves 112/113 looks weak, but maybe nothing really improves).
Incidentally, what might(?) have happened with move ~100 is that Houdini cleared its hash table when the 50-move rule was on the horizon (somewhere RH confirmed that it did this, but I can't track it down), and then on re-search it didn't get as deep, and thought it was slightly winning rather than slightly losing.
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:03 am
by Jeremy Bernstein
BB+ wrote:Just to wrap up the "Rybka poor time-management" story, Houdini managed to win that game.
As one commenter put it, top-level chess doesn't start until move 100 these days.

There's currently a web-hosting break, so I can't look at the full data from the TCEC website. My recollection is that Rybka was down to increments (30 seconds) more-or-less, while Houdini had maybe 5 extra minutes. It looks like the f5-push just became more-and-more feasible, and Black cracked (moves 112/113 looks weak, but maybe nothing really improves).
Incidentally, what might(?) have happened with move ~100 is that Houdini cleared its hash table when the 50-move rule was on the horizon (somewhere RH confirmed that it did this, but I can't track it down), and then on re-search it didn't get as deep, and thought it was slightly winning rather than slightly losing.
Rybka 4 loves ...Qd5 for a very long time on my SP 32-bit XP VM. Only after 5:30, ply 14 in rybkatalk (so 17 in the real world, I guess), does it move on to ...Kh8. I'll wait and see what it decides after 20 minutes or so.
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:18 am
by Jeremy Bernstein
Jeremy Bernstein wrote:BB+ wrote:Just to wrap up the "Rybka poor time-management" story, Houdini managed to win that game.
As one commenter put it, top-level chess doesn't start until move 100 these days.

There's currently a web-hosting break, so I can't look at the full data from the TCEC website. My recollection is that Rybka was down to increments (30 seconds) more-or-less, while Houdini had maybe 5 extra minutes. It looks like the f5-push just became more-and-more feasible, and Black cracked (moves 112/113 looks weak, but maybe nothing really improves).
Incidentally, what might(?) have happened with move ~100 is that Houdini cleared its hash table when the 50-move rule was on the horizon (somewhere RH confirmed that it did this, but I can't track it down), and then on re-search it didn't get as deep, and thought it was slightly winning rather than slightly losing.
Rybka 4 loves ...Qd5 for a very long time on my SP 32-bit XP VM. Only after 5:30, ply 14 in rybkatalk (so 17 in the real world, I guess), does it move on to ...Kh8. I'll wait and see what it decides after 20 minutes or so.
After 21:54 (ply 17), we're at ...f5. Anyhow, anyone accusing Martin of rigging the games, or blaming the UI for strange behavior, should run some simple tests. This is just how R4 works in this position.
Jeremy
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:27 am
by Martin Thoresen
Yeah well I don't know what to say really, some people throw many strange accusations in the air.
Thanks for testing out the position Jeremy. I can't provide anything else than the logs (which I posted in talkchess).
Best,
Martin
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:10 am
by BB+
I might say that, for the first long shifting part of this game 12, Rybka seemed to outplay Houdini (slightly), but it was only enough to move the eval from equal to -0.2 or so. I've never liked these French (or Caro-Kann here) games where Black gets cxd4 in and White chooses not to re-capture. Of course, there is often little negative from White's view (the pawn can usually be won back, and if not, Black frequently has no entry point -- plus White here got the bishop pair, which again makes Black reluctant to open the position).
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:04 am
by BB+
Side puzzle for humans (Game 16): Black just played 33...Qxa3 (Rybka, of course, did not) -- how do you refute this?
Side puzzle for centaurs/analysts: does White indeed win the resulting Q vs BB endgame (2 or 3 pawns per side, and maybe with rooks)?

I fully expect "yes", but it seems to hover around +4 for a little too long for my taste.
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:31 am
by BB+
Game 16 has now become RBB+2 vs RB+5. There is talk of Rybka "over-valuing" passed pawns (again?), though it might be a more general problem of pieces versus pawns. Certainly in the opening a piece is worth almost 4 pawns, but in the endgame, while the "standard" value is 3, this can vary significantly depending upon if the pawns are weak/dangerous.
It should be an interesting endgame if nothing else, though I expect a draw in the end.
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:23 am
by BB+
Game 16, Move 54, Rybka did not play what I think is a clever move here (I get 0.00 scores with TBs):
Black can play 54...Rb6, and I think the draw is easier than after 54...f5. The main point is that after 55. Rd5+ cxd5 56. cxb6 Kd6 57. b7 Kc7 58. Bxd5 White makes no progress. If the White King goes to win the a3-pawn, Black advances his kingside pawns to trade off White's f-pawn.
Still looks to be headed for a draw, though Stockfish gets excited a lot.
Re: Houdini-Rybka (150m + 30s) LIVE! - TCEC Elite Match Seas
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:53 am
by BB+
Game 28 is another quite interesting game.
It doesn't seem as though the h4-push went as well as Black had hoped, and White had a definite advantage in the mid-20s of the move count. There were some nice lines after 28. Qe2 (Black can then "trap" the g3 Rook via 28... Bh4 29. Rg6 Kf7 30. Rg5, but White's attack rolls through if Black wins the exchange), while the game line was also cute with the Knights hopping. White gets nothing from 33. Nd3 Nh8 (though lines with 34. Rg5 can be interesting for humans -- note that if the Rook leaves the g-file (Ra6 or Re6), Black should draw after Rg7+), so Rybka has tried the "piece sac" of 33. Ng4 instead. After 34... Bf6, Black is aiming to round-up the Rook via Nh8 (White can't play 36. Qxd3 because of 36... Rd8, when either the d2-bishop hangs, or the Rg6 goes -- though there are some tactics here after 37. Qc2 Nh8 38. Rxf6+ because Black's Rh7 is also unguarded).
As a sidenote, it seems that Houdini typically prefers a piece to 3 pawns, while Rybka (at least relatively) prefers the pawns. A number of recent games have had this motif [and the current evals reflect this too, Rybka says +0.96 and Houdini +0.15].