Re: SedatChess
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 7:18 am
Dear Homayoun,
Now I see and nice to read...!
One thing more, Believe it or not:
There are such 'more' original Top engines,
They are worse..e.g not capable to 'Ponder'
During opponent's turn...just imagine:
3000-3700 Elo and can not ponder..hehe ))
Is this all? not of course,
What about theirs similarities to Stockfish?
Is there any 100% proof that they are not
Based mainly on others authors ideas?
Is this all? not of course,
The authors of SF family engines do not hide..
They clearly say..but I can not say as same words
For all rest more original engines..who often try to
Say e.g my work is original, started from scratch etc
Sure here I am not going to talk more, but at least
I may say: Similarities tools rarely make mistakes!
Btw, let Me say please a few words about Me,
You asked that ever I played vs chess engines?
Sure I have played so many times, but mainly
Vs weak engines which are close to my strength..
And here I refer mainly about the past such as
During 1995-2005 years, if you are going to ask
My favorite programs, which I used to play vs
Chessmaster personalities, Arasan plus many more,
But I admit that in most games I was defeated, since
I played mainly at fast time controls etc. but in Rapid,
I was better..and as far as remember, I've managed
Often to draw, even sometimes to win..
About my games vs Humans (usually I played with friends),
Sure not always, but often I managed to win.. it's not that
I am much better than them, but my knowledge over openings..
It seems and played as serious, as advantage over..you know,
The openings play as golden key to gain better points!
On the other hand, this is also true that:
Many people (even who were better/stronger than Me)
Were defeated...and I think here as main reason played:
Very likely the pressure, since they were aware that
I'm involved in computer chess, as not bad book maker!
But in overall, there is one true..I'm not so good,
Maybe about 1600-1800 Elo (in strength)
What I can say more,
We (You and Me) are different...if all were same,
Our chess world would not be too much boring ?)
Plus there should be TDs who have to test, organize
Tours, running ratings with engines, with books etc.
And how happy that I am of one of them!
Greetings
Now I see and nice to read...!
One thing more, Believe it or not:
There are such 'more' original Top engines,
They are worse..e.g not capable to 'Ponder'
During opponent's turn...just imagine:
3000-3700 Elo and can not ponder..hehe ))
Is this all? not of course,
What about theirs similarities to Stockfish?
Is there any 100% proof that they are not
Based mainly on others authors ideas?
Is this all? not of course,
The authors of SF family engines do not hide..
They clearly say..but I can not say as same words
For all rest more original engines..who often try to
Say e.g my work is original, started from scratch etc
Sure here I am not going to talk more, but at least
I may say: Similarities tools rarely make mistakes!
Btw, let Me say please a few words about Me,
You asked that ever I played vs chess engines?
Sure I have played so many times, but mainly
Vs weak engines which are close to my strength..
And here I refer mainly about the past such as
During 1995-2005 years, if you are going to ask
My favorite programs, which I used to play vs
Chessmaster personalities, Arasan plus many more,
But I admit that in most games I was defeated, since
I played mainly at fast time controls etc. but in Rapid,
I was better..and as far as remember, I've managed
Often to draw, even sometimes to win..
About my games vs Humans (usually I played with friends),
Sure not always, but often I managed to win.. it's not that
I am much better than them, but my knowledge over openings..
It seems and played as serious, as advantage over..you know,
The openings play as golden key to gain better points!
On the other hand, this is also true that:
Many people (even who were better/stronger than Me)
Were defeated...and I think here as main reason played:
Very likely the pressure, since they were aware that
I'm involved in computer chess, as not bad book maker!
But in overall, there is one true..I'm not so good,
Maybe about 1600-1800 Elo (in strength)
What I can say more,
We (You and Me) are different...if all were same,
Our chess world would not be too much boring ?)
Plus there should be TDs who have to test, organize
Tours, running ratings with engines, with books etc.
And how happy that I am of one of them!
Greetings