SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Discussion about chess-playing software (engines, hosts, opening books, platforms, etc...)
User avatar
APOCALYPSE
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
Contact:

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by APOCALYPSE »

Sedat Canbaz wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:24 am
APOCALYPSE wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:22 pm SF-POLY (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team) vs. Stockfish 16.1 (Stockfish developers) vs. Killfish (Anton Ces) vs. SF-PRO (APOCALYPSE) vs. C_Dragon (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team)
Image
Windows 11 Pro
GUI Fritz 19
Threads=1
Hash=128
Permanent Brain=OFF
Tablebases=OFF
Opening Book=Perfect2023.ctg
Time=0.3min+1sec

Games in PGN (Filtering): PGN results can be downloaded in the description under the video.
Thank you so much and Congrats to Tanick Ramz!
Really SF-POLY's performance is impressive again!!

On other hand, may I ask you a question:
Why did you unannotate the games (depth, time etc) ?

E.g with unannotated database,
No chances to check which games are lost on time etc.
Who knows? maybe again SF-PRO lost on time..as in my recent organized tour
Plus as now (with no annotations), no way to see which time control is used...
E.g according your manuel details, I read as 20sec+ 1sec, right ?

But anyhow, just in case of new, future competitions, tests..,
Please consider the played games to be with all comments!
Thanks...

Greetings )
I have added the original file only at your request, you can download it in the same area.
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 2289
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

APOCALYPSE wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:51 am
I have added the original file only at your request, you can download it in the same area.
Thank you.. now is :difus_19
No any game to be lost on time..
It seems all stable..

On other hand,
Sure you've played under different cond.than mine
So no way to expect same/similar performances..
But it's nice to see the titans to be in battle...)

Greetings
User avatar
APOCALYPSE
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
Contact:

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by APOCALYPSE »

catalano
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2022 7:41 pm
Real Name: Tasman

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by catalano »

APOCALYPSE wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:51 am
Sedat Canbaz wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:24 am
APOCALYPSE wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:22 pm SF-POLY (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team) vs. Stockfish 16.1 (Stockfish developers) vs. Killfish (Anton Ces) vs. SF-PRO (APOCALYPSE) vs. C_Dragon (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team)
Image
Windows 11 Pro
GUI Fritz 19
Threads=1
Hash=128
Permanent Brain=OFF
Tablebases=OFF
Opening Book=Perfect2023.ctg
Time=0.3min+1sec

Games in PGN (Filtering): PGN results can be downloaded in the description under the video.
Thank you so much and Congrats to Tanick Ramz!
Really SF-POLY's performance is impressive again!!

On other hand, may I ask you a question:
Why did you unannotate the games (depth, time etc) ?

E.g with unannotated database,
No chances to check which games are lost on time etc.
Who knows? maybe again SF-PRO lost on time..as in my recent organized tour
Plus as now (with no annotations), no way to see which time control is used...
E.g according your manuel details, I read as 20sec+ 1sec, right ?

But anyhow, just in case of new, future competitions, tests..,
Please consider the played games to be with all comments!
Thanks...

Greetings )
I have added the original file only at your request, you can download it in the same area.
Can you share SF-POLY?

Thks
User avatar
OrgZ
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:15 pm

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by OrgZ »

catalano wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 8:04 pm
APOCALYPSE wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:51 am
Sedat Canbaz wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:24 am
APOCALYPSE wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:22 pm SF-POLY (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team) vs. Stockfish 16.1 (Stockfish developers) vs. Killfish (Anton Ces) vs. SF-PRO (APOCALYPSE) vs. C_Dragon (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team)
Image
Windows 11 Pro
GUI Fritz 19
Threads=1
Hash=128
Permanent Brain=OFF
Tablebases=OFF
Opening Book=Perfect2023.ctg
Time=0.3min+1sec

Games in PGN (Filtering): PGN results can be downloaded in the description under the video.
Thank you so much and Congrats to Tanick Ramz!
Really SF-POLY's performance is impressive again!!

On other hand, may I ask you a question:
Why did you unannotate the games (depth, time etc) ?

E.g with unannotated database,
No chances to check which games are lost on time etc.
Who knows? maybe again SF-PRO lost on time..as in my recent organized tour
Plus as now (with no annotations), no way to see which time control is used...
E.g according your manuel details, I read as 20sec+ 1sec, right ?

But anyhow, just in case of new, future competitions, tests..,
Please consider the played games to be with all comments!
Thanks...

Greetings )
I have added the original file only at your request, you can download it in the same area.
Can you share SF-POLY?

Thks
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3564&p=35829#p35829
User avatar
APOCALYPSE
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
Contact:

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by APOCALYPSE »

User avatar
APOCALYPSE
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
Contact:

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by APOCALYPSE »

User avatar
APOCALYPSE
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
Contact:

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by APOCALYPSE »

SF-PRO (APOCALYPSE) vs. SF-POLY (Tanick Ramz and SF-Team)
Image
Image
Windows 11 Pro
GUI Fritz 19
Threads=1
Hash=128
Permanent Brain=OFF
Tablebases=OFF
Opening Book=Perfect2023.bin
Time=0.5min+1sec
Book Settings:
BestBookMove=OFF
BookDepth=20
Games in PGN (Original): PGN results can be downloaded in the description under the video.
User avatar
OrgZ
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:15 pm

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by OrgZ »

Thanks, but i just wonder. How many tests and patches you did/used to finally get that 😂. As long as you had fun while doing it, thats all that is needed. :difus_19
User avatar
APOCALYPSE
Posts: 350
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
Contact:

Re: SF-Pro 15.07.2023

Post by APOCALYPSE »

OrgZ wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:11 pm Thanks, but i just wonder. How many tests and patches you did/used to finally get that 😂. As long as you had fun while doing it, thats all that is needed. :difus_19
I worked with the patch after the first test and already on the second test I got the desired result, which you already saw a little higher.

Your engine was truly very powerful among the engines I have ever seen in a very long time — bravo👍.
Post Reply