Page 15 of 16

Re: gull chess

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:48 pm
by ThinkingALot
Magdalina wrote:What are the changes have you made from 2.2?
Some search tweaks. You can view the changes using a text comparision utility (http://www.angusj.com/delphi/textdiff.html).

Re: gull chess

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:19 pm
by User923005
This thing works really well too:
http://winmerge.org/

I set it to "ignore all white space" on the settings page, because I run the code through indent:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/univers ... =directory
{I don't use the GUI tool, I just run it from the command line with my own scripts}

I also change all of the structures and enum so that they are not unnamed. This is helpful so that documentation tools like doxygen won't label them as "struct <irritating absurd nonsense structure name goes here>".
[see attached image]

Re: gull chess

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:36 am
by Magdalina
thanks, these utilities are really useful

Re: gull chess

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:06 am
by Magdalina
done a short test for the new version of the bird.
120games, 1+0 bullet time control, 128 hash table each, both in original parameters in intel dual core.

Gull 2.3 x64 (+32elo) +30/=71/-19 54.58% 65.5/120
Gull 2.2 x64 (-32elo) +19/=71/-30 45.42% 54.5/120

wow. excellent strength gain! :)

Re: gull chess

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:42 am
by Magdalina
And 2.3 vs 2.1. same time control and all as above.

270games

Gull 2.3 x64 +85 elo +106/=123/-41 62.04% 167.5/270
Gull 2.1 x64 -85 elo +41/=123/-106 37.96% 102.5/270

wow.

Re: gull chess

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 3:54 pm
by Adam Hair
Has anyone had a problem with running Gull 2.2 or Gull 2.3 under linux+Wine with the hash set to 1024 MB or more? At 1024 MB, the speed is approximately 15 kns on my computer as opposed to approximately 1500 kns when the hash is less than 1000MB . Also, when the hash is set at 2048 MB, Gull becomes unresponsive (will not send 'readyok'). I have 'Large memory pages' set to false since similar options for other engines seem to be incompatible with Wine.

Re: gull chess

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:24 pm
by Magdalina
ThinkingALot wrote:..
Hellow ThinkALot. Congratulations for being qualified for stage4. Can we have the new Gull R600, the one that's competing for stage4?

Re: gull chess

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 2:11 pm
by ThinkingALot
I'll keep this version private.

Re: gull chess

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:18 pm
by Damir Desevac
why keep it private? Gull 2.3 is old. People want Gull R600.

Re: gull chess

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:04 pm
by Dr.Wael Deeb
Gull 2.3 is not that old Damir ;)

Besides,the author has the right to do whatever he wants with his creation 8-)
Dr.D