Page 2 of 2
Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:18 pm
by Dr.Wael Deeb
Dr. Ivannik wrote:Gentlemen
I remember the good old days when a correspondence chess player's tools where his chess books and notes. Is the use of engines allowed in today's correspondence tournaments???
Dr Ivannik
Of course they are
Cheers,
Dr.D
Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:27 am
by Hood
Dr. Ivannik wrote:Gentlemen
I remember the good old days when a correspondence chess player's tools where his chess books and notes. Is the use of engines allowed in today's correspondence tournaments???
Dr Ivannik
I remember thouse good days , too

but the things has changed

.
So there is need for other preparation. Books, databases are on the computer disk.
Rgds Hood
Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:15 am
by jim uselton
Lets say a guy is a 1500 player but is pretty good with computers. His computer is 2yrs old---Dell inspiron 531. He downloads Stockfish 1.9---voila---he is now a grandmaster! Can he not beat any GM in the world? Just curious! How would he do in a 10 game match with Anand or Topalov?

Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:11 am
by Uly
jim uselton wrote:Can he not beat any GM in the world? Just curious! How would he do in a 10 game match with Anand or Topalov?

Yeah, but the thread is talking about a
Correspondence GM, and yeah, some guy with old hardware could have analysis methods with Stockfish 1.9 that allow him to beat people with worse analysis methods even if they're running high end hardware with better engines, giving him the chance to become Correspondence GM, but it's definitively not going to be about sitting in front of the computer to watch Stockfish reaching high depth, it's going to take a lot of work, and the slower the hardware the higher the effort that he needs.
Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:08 am
by Hood
Are we able to have any conclusions ?
a) analysis methods -> what GUIs neccessary
b) hardware -> minimal reasonable
c) software -> engines
rgds Hood
Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:12 pm
by Dayffd
Hood wrote:Are we able to have any conclusions ?
a) analysis methods -> what GUIs neccessary
b) hardware -> minimal reasonable
c) software -> engines
rgds Hood
There is only one thing missing. I used to play correspondence chess until the engines came into play. I have all of the engines; if I want to play against an engine, why would I spend the time and money to play correspondence chess? I can play against chess engines at home on my computers. I prefer to pay against people which means correspondence chess is out and otb chess is the only avenue available now.
Re: Correspondence GM ?
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:03 pm
by Hood
The factor of the computer analysis is about 70-80 % but the human has own input in the game.