Page 2 of 12
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:58 pm
by Matthias Gemuh
robbolito wrote:
Blitz:10' 0
1 Houdini 1.03a x64 8_CPU 3185 +6/-4/=40 52.00% 26.0/50
2 Ivanhoe 52bU-x64 3195 +4/-6/=40 48.00% 24.0/50
Hi Robbolito,
using MS Visual Studio 2008, I can easily compile you on the Windows platform.
When I try to compile Ivanhoe, I get many error messages. Can you help ?
Matthias.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:00 pm
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Best engines-5 2010
Code: Select all
1 2 3
1 Ivanhoe 52bU-x64 3185 +23 15.5 - 12.514.0 - 14.0** 29.5/56
2 Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU 3190 -8 12.5 - 15.515.0 - 13.0 ** 27.5/56
3 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3190 -14 14.0 - 14.013.0 - 15.0 ** 27.0/56
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:33 pm
by kingliveson
A few very long games with 2GB Hash:
More long games with 512 MB Hash:
A few more long games with 256 MB Hash:
Plus a few more with 256 MB Hash:
TimeMoreWhenLosing and TimeMoreWhenWinning were checked for these game.
TimeImitateOpponent: Idea is not to fall too behind on time
TimeMoreWhenLosing: Play slower when eval score gets worse
TimeMoreWhenWinning: play slower when eval score gets better
TimeImitateOpponent and TimeMoreWhenLosing combined have been
tested, and did well. Though TimeMoreWhenLosing code has changed slightly with new conditions added in latest IvanHoe. TimeMoreWhenLosing and TimeMoreWhenWinning only makes sense in very long time control games in my opinion. Used in short/blitz games, IvanHoe might get into time trouble.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:19 am
by Canto
Is T52 the same as 9.52b ? You're showing two names.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:48 am
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 IvanHoe T52B.x64 3190 +4/-2/=14 55.00% 11.0/20
2 Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU 3190 +2/-4/=14 45.00% 9.0/20
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:16 pm
by kingliveson
Code: Select all
Ivanhoe v Rybka R0001, 4'/40+4'/40+4'/4 2010
1 IvanHoe 9.52b x64 +12/=28/-10 52.00% 26.0/50
2 Deep Rybka 4 x64 +10/=28/-12 48.00% 24.0/50
† 25 Positions (test suite)
† 3-4-5 Nalimov/Robbobase
† 128 MB Hash
† Ponder Off
† Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @ 3100 MHz
† 2 Cores
† 40/4 Repeating Time Control
Rybka
TC Buffer 3
TC Normal Move Time 100
TC Max Move Time 150
IvanHoe
Pawn Hash 16 MB
Game data available: http://chess.cygnitec.com/pgn/
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:29 am
by robbolito
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor6x @ 3.2 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 23.33
KNS: 11196
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
1 Deep Rybka 4 x64 3190 +3/-1/=16 55.00% 11.0/20
2 IvanHoe 9.52b x64KLO 3190 +1/-3/=16 45.00% 9.0/20
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:40 am
by bulldozer
Canto wrote:Is T52 the same as 9.52b ? You're showing two names.
No. The first one is Ahmed's compile and the other one is KLO's compile, based on the same source. I think Ahmed added some eval changes on his compile.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:50 am
by Eduard Nemeth
Short match IvanHoe 9.52b w32 vs Houdini 1.03a w32
CPU=Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz
GUI=Fritz 10
PB=ON
Hash=128 MB, 128 MB
Timecontrol=3m + 0s
Testsuite NEW RATING LIST --> PGN see here:
http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php ... 79&start=0
Download:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/xgr7v5ka2s7l2t0/NewHRR.7z
Result after first 5 variations (from the 60 Variations) = 10 games.
Code: Select all
Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Blitz 3m + 0s
1234567890
1 IvanHoe 9.52b w32 (used 1-core) ½½011½½½½½ 5.5/10
2 Houdini 1.03a w32 2_CPU (used 1-core) ½½100½½½½½ 4.5/10
I sopped the match after 10 games, then In my opinion,
both engine play equally (Both engines have the same strength) - Only my opinion! Currently best game in my eyes was this:
PGN:
ED.
Re: IvanHoe T52 testing
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:18 am
by robbolito
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4CPU 960 3.20GHz8x @ 4.005 GHz with 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 24.98
KNS: 11988
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: HS 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0
Code: Select all
12345678901234
1 IvanHoe 9.52b alpha x64 3190 ½½½1½½½½0½1½½½ 7.5/14
2 Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU 3190 ½½½0½½½½1½0½½½ 6.5/14
Experimental version.