Tinapa 1.01

Swaminathan · Post by **Swaminathan** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:36 am

http://sites.google.com/site/strategict ... st-results

1000 Positions
10 seconds per position
Hardware: Q6600, 32 bits, 2 GB RAM, 2.4 GHZ. Arena 2.01 GUI.

Hagen · Post by **Hagen** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:58 am

Fascinating results...according to this...the "modification" makes Stockfish 1.8 TinaPA 1.01 stronger than Crab, Spoon and Tactical. What would be interesting to find out is whether this modification actually makes Stockfish increase its ELO rating.

Chris Formula · Post by **Chris Formula** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:25 am

Swaminathan wrote:

http://sites.google.com/site/strategict ... st-results

1000 Positions
10 seconds per position
Hardware: Q6600, 32 bits, 2 GB RAM, 2.4 GHZ. Arena 2.01 GUI.

hi Swami,

thanks for the quick STS testing. i wish this "sts-point" improvement translates to "elo-point" improvement.

regards,
chris

Uly · Post by **Uly** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:35 am

Any plans on a 64bit release?

Eduard Nemeth · Post by **Eduard Nemeth** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:06 am

The aggressiveness is too high!

I played an short engine match vs. Houdini 1.02
1-cpu vs 1-cpu and ponder ON.

After the first two variants of Nunn1 suite
Houdini won 2 games and 2 games ended draw.

Much better is this setting (only my opinion):

Code: Select all

[OPTIONS]
Mobility (Middle Game)=80
Aggressiveness=80

After first 3 games with Nunn1 suite Tinapa 1.01 won now 1 game with 2 draws.

CPU=Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz
GUI=Fritz 10
EGTB=GUI only
Hash=128 MB, 128 MB
Timecontrol=3m + 0s
Book=Nunn1 suite

Here are the first 3 games with this settings:

[Event "Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Blitz:3'"] 
[Site "Privat"] 
[Date "2010.07.08"] 
[Round "1"] 
[White "Houdini 1.02 w32 1_CPU"] 
[Black "Tinapa 1.01"] 
[Result "1/2-1/2"] 
[ECO "B33"] 
[Annotator "0.03;0.00"] 
[PlyCount "152"] 
[TimeControl "180"] 
 
{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz 2660 MHz W=18.1 ply; 1.467kN/ 
s B=21.1 ply; 1.071kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nb5 Nf6 
6. N1c3 d6 7. Bf4 e5 8. Bg5 a6 9. Na3 b5 10. Bxf6 gxf6 11. Nd5 f5 12. c3 Bg7 
13. exf5 Bxf5 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 14. Nc2 {0.03/16 5} Be6 {(0-0) 0.00/16 8} 
15. a4 {(Sce3) 0.08/17 5} O-O {-0.16/17 6} 16. axb5 {0.08/18 0} axb5 { 
-0.28/18 7} 17. Rxa8 {0.06/18 2} Qxa8 {-0.36/17 0} 18. Nc7 {0.06/18 2} Qa7 { 
(Da2) -0.16/19 2} 19. Nxe6 {0.00/17 11} fxe6 {-0.28/19 0} 20. Ne3 {-0.01/16 4} 
Qf7 {(d5) -0.40/20 2} 21. Qc2 {-0.02/16 2} b4 {-0.28/18 1} 22. Bd3 { 
(Lb5) -0.10/16 1} d5 {-0.52/16 4} 23. Bxh7+ {-0.09/17 0} Kh8 {-0.28/16 0} 24. 
Bd3 {(0-0) -0.06/19 18} bxc3 {-0.24/16 4} 25. bxc3 {-0.06/19 0} Rc8 { 
(e4) -0.28/16 4} 26. Qd2 {0.04/16 2} e4 {-0.12/16 4} 27. Ba6 {(Le2) 0.02/18 0} 
Rc7 {(Ta8) -0.32/16 6} 28. Nd1 {0.09/16 4} Ne5 {-0.04/17 6} 29. Be2 { 
(0-0) 0.04/18 0} Kg8 {(Df5) -0.20/17 7} 30. O-O {0.14/14 3} Qe7 { 
(Dg6) 0.00/15 1} 31. Qe3 {0.14/14 3} Bf8 {(Ta7) 0.00/18 1} 32. Qb6 { 
(Sb2) 0.09/14 4} Rc6 {0.00/16 3} 33. Qb8 {0.10/16 0} Qd6 {(Dc7) 0.00/20 4} 34. 
Qe8 {0.10/15 7} Qc5 {(Tc7) 0.08/19 0} 35. Kh1 {0.19/17 3} Qe7 {0.12/19 2} 36. 
Qh5 {0.15/18 14} Bg7 {0.24/19 0} 37. f3 {0.20/17 1} exf3 {0.04/17 2} 38. Bxf3 { 
0.22/17 2} Qf7 {(Tc4) 0.08/19 1} 39. Qg5 {(Le2) 0.24/16 2} Qf6 {0.08/19 4} 40. 
Qd2 {(De3) 0.22/18 2} Qh6 {0.00/16 3} 41. Qb2 {(De2) 0.22/17 0} Nxf3 { 
(Tc8) 0.16/15 4} 42. Rxf3 {(Db8+) 0.26/15 1} Rc4 {0.12/17 10} 43. Kg1 { 
(Db8+) 0.30/17 0} Be5 {(Tf4) 0.20/14 3} 44. g3 {0.29/16 4} Qg6 {0.48/15 0} 45. 
Kg2 {0.32/15 1} Kg7 {(Lg7) 0.72/14 2} 46. Nf2 {0.34/15 2} Kg8 {0.72/16 0} 47. 
Qa3 {0.38/15 1} Rc7 {(Lg7) 0.92/17 4} 48. Qa8+ {(Df8+) 0.49/15 1} Kh7 { 
0.88/17 2} 49. Qb8 {0.53/17 0} Qg8 {(Dg7) 1.13/17 2} 50. Rf8 {(Db4) 0.50/15 1} 
Qg7 {0.92/16 2} 51. Nd3 {0.55/16 0} Rf7 {(Ld6) 1.13/18 3} 52. Rxf7 {0.58/15 1} 
Bxb8 {1.05/19 0} 53. Rxg7+ {0.65/16 0} Kxg7 {1.05/19 0} 54. h4 {0.53/16 2} Kf6 
{(Lc7) 1.25/21 2} 55. Nf4 {(Kf3) 0.83/16 2} Bc7 {1.61/21 2} 56. Kh3 { 
(Se2) 0.83/18 0} Ba5 {1.53/20 2} 57. Ne2 {0.89/18 0} e5 {0.48/20 1} 58. g4 { 
0.89/18 0} Kg6 {(e4) 0.68/21 2} 59. Kg2 {(g5) 0.56/16 3} Bd8 {0.56/21 2} 60. 
Kg3 {0.62/18 0} Bc7 {(Lb6) 0.80/21 3} 61. Kf3 {(Sc1) 0.69/18 1} Ba5 {0.00/21 1} 
62. g5 {0.44/17 6} Kf5 {0.00/25 0} 63. Kf2 {(Sg3+) 0.35/17 1} Bb6+ {0.00/26 1} 
64. Kg2 {(Kf3) 0.32/19 0} Bd8 {(Le3) 0.00/24 1} 65. Kh3 {(Sg3+) 0.34/17 1} Ba5 
{0.00/23 2} 66. Ng3+ {0.34/18 0} Ke6 {0.00/24 1} 67. Kg4 {(h5) 0.21/18 7} Bxc3 
{0.00/23 2} 68. h5 {0.21/16 0} e4 {0.00/23 1} 69. Ne2 {(h6) 0.20/16 1} Be5 { 
0.00/24 1} 70. Nf4+ {0.17/17 3} Bxf4 {0.00/30 0} 71. Kxf4 {0.15/18 0} Kf7 { 
0.00/30 1} 72. Ke3 {0.00/21 0} Kg8 {0.00/31 1} 73. Ke2 {(h6) 0.00/24 0} Kh7 { 
(Kg7) 0.00/32 1} 74. Kf2 {(Ke3) 0.00/25 1} d4 {0.00/33 1} 75. Ke2 {0.00/26 0} 
Kg7 {(Kg8) 0.00/33 1} 76. Kf2 {(Kd2) 0.00/24 1} Kh7 { 
(Kf7) Remis angenommen 0.00/35 1} 1/2-1/2

[Event "Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Blitz:3'"] 
[Site "Privat"] 
[Date "2010.07.08"] 
[Round "2"] 
[White "Tinapa 1.01"] 
[Black "Houdini 1.02 w32 1_CPU"] 
[Result "1/2-1/2"] 
[ECO "B33"] 
[Annotator "-0.16;-0.04"] 
[PlyCount "90"] 
[TimeControl "180"] 
 
{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz 2660 MHz W=19.1 ply; 954kN/s 
B=18.1 ply; 1.370kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nb5 Nf6 6. 
N1c3 d6 7. Bf4 e5 8. Bg5 a6 9. Na3 b5 10. Bxf6 gxf6 11. Nd5 f5 12. c3 Bg7 13. 
exf5 Bxf5 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 14. Be2 {-0.16/17 5} Ne7 {(Le6) -0.04/15 3} 
15. O-O {(Sxe7) 0.08/18 7} O-O {0.09/18 15} 16. Nxe7+ {0.24/17 0} Qxe7 { 
0.09/17 21} 17. Nc2 {0.20/19 0} Be6 {0.09/17 2} 18. Nb4 {0.36/19 10} e4 { 
0.12/18 0} 19. a4 {(Dd2) 0.12/19 6} Qg5 {(bxa4) -0.06/15 3} 20. Qc2 {-0.16/16 7 
} d5 {0.03/16 0} 21. f4 {(Tfd1) -0.20/16 3} Qe7 {0.02/16 3} 22. f5 {0.00/17 1} 
a5 {0.02/17 2} 23. Na6 {-0.12/18 4} Qa7+ {0.03/17 4} 24. Kh1 {-0.04/20 1} Qxa6 
{0.07/17 1} 25. axb5 {(fxe6) 0.00/19 3} Qb6 {0.09/18 7} 26. fxe6 {0.00/21 0} 
fxe6 {0.05/18 8} 27. Qd2 {0.00/20 0} Rxf1+ {(h6) 0.06/17 3} 28. Rxf1 {0.00/22 6 
} h6 {(Tf8) 0.09/18 0} 29. g3 {(Df4) 0.00/16 3} a4 {0.09/15 2} 30. Kg2 { 
0.16/16 2} Rc8 {(a3) 0.09/17 0} 31. Qf4 {0.16/19 5} Rf8 {0.09/17 0} 32. Qc1 { 
0.36/18 11} Rb8 {(Tc8) 0.15/18 7} 33. Qd1 {(Dc2) 0.24/16 6} Qa7 { 
(Da5) 0.15/17 2} 34. Qd2 {(Dc2) 0.08/15 4} Qc5 {(Db6) 0.15/16 2} 35. Qf4 { 
(Dc2) 0.04/17 10} Rf8 {0.07/16 2} 36. Qh4 {0.12/16 1} Rxf1 {0.09/17 1} 37. Kxf1 
{0.00/19 2} a3 {0.06/17 0} 38. bxa3 {0.00/19 3} Qxa3 {0.06/18 0} 39. Qg4 { 
0.00/18 4} Qd6 {(Dc1+) 0.05/19 0} 40. c4 {0.00/16 3} Kf7 {0.13/18 4} 41. Kg2 { 
(Dh5+) 0.00/20 0} Bd4 {0.06/17 2} 42. Qh5+ {0.08/19 1} Kg7 {0.02/17 0} 43. Qg4+ 
{(cxd5) 0.00/19 3} Kf7 {0.05/20 2} 44. Qh5+ {0.00/22 0} Kg7 {0.05/22 1} 45. 
Qg4+ {(cxd5) 0.00/22 1} Kf7 {Remis angenommen 0.05/21 1} 1/2-1/2

And now a nice win:

[Event "Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Blitz:3'"] 
[Site "Privat"] 
[Date "2010.07.08"] 
[Round "3"] 
[White "Houdini 1.02 w32 1_CPU"] 
[Black "Tinapa 1.01"] 
[Result "0-1"] 
[ECO "B89"] 
[Annotator "-0.02;-0.32"] 
[PlyCount "174"] 
[TimeControl "180"] 
 
{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz 2660 MHz W=18.8 ply; 1.509kN/ 
s B=19.5 ply; 1.141kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 
6. Bc4 e6 7. Be3 a6 8. Qe2 Qc7 9. O-O-O Be7 10. Bb3 O-O {Beide letzter Buchzug} 
11. Kb1 {-0.02/16 4} b5 {-0.32/16 7} 12. Nxc6 {-0.06/17 0} Qxc6 {-0.40/14 0} 
13. f3 {-0.07/16 3} Rb8 {-0.52/17 2} 14. Qd2 {(Dd3) -0.08/16 4} a5 {-0.72/18 5} 
15. a4 {(a3) -0.10/18 0} bxa4 {-0.96/18 6} 16. Nxa4 {-0.21/17 2} d5 { 
(Tb4) -0.96/19 3} 17. Qc3 {-0.34/15 3} Qxc3 {-1.13/18 1} 18. Nxc3 {-0.40/17 1} 
dxe4 {-1.05/20 4} 19. Nxe4 {(fxe4) -0.35/18 0} Nxe4 {-1.01/18 4} 20. fxe4 { 
-0.35/20 0} Bb7 {-0.96/20 4} 21. Bf4 {-0.37/20 0} Rbd8 {-0.92/21 4} 22. Bc7 { 
-0.41/19 4} Rxd1+ {-1.09/20 0} 23. Rxd1 {-0.40/19 0} Bxe4 {-1.17/20 5} 24. g3 { 
-0.43/20 0} Ra8 {-0.76/20 7} 25. Ba4 {(Td4) -0.39/19 6} Bd5 {(Lg5) -1.01/18 7} 
26. b3 {-0.37/18 6} Kf8 {(Le4) -0.80/17 4} 27. c4 {-0.25/18 3} Be4+ { 
(Lf3) -0.88/18 0} 28. Kb2 {(Kc1) -0.24/18 3} f6 {-0.76/19 3} 29. Rd7 { 
(Lb6) -0.21/19 0} e5 {-0.96/19 8} 30. Bd6 {(Lb6) -0.27/21 20} Bxd6 {-1.17/20 4} 
31. Rxd6 {-0.27/21 2} Ra7 {(Lf5) -1.05/19 0} 32. Kc3 {-0.26/18 2} Ke7 { 
-1.01/18 3} 33. Rb6 {(c5) -0.25/19 0} Bg2 {(Lf5) -1.01/19 5} 34. Kd3 { 
-0.25/18 3} Bf3 {(Lb7) -0.88/18 0} 35. Rb8 {(Ke3) -0.20/16 2} Ra8 {-0.92/21 3} 
36. Rb6 {-0.16/18 1} g6 {(Lh1) -0.92/19 4} 37. Ke3 {(Kd2) -0.12/18 2} Bh1 { 
(Lg2) -0.72/21 5} 38. h4 {(Ke2) -0.17/19 2} h6 {(Lg2) -0.80/20 7} 39. c5 { 
(g4) -0.11/18 3} Bg2 {-1.01/17 2} 40. Kf2 {(g4) -0.15/19 0} Bd5 { 
(Le4) -1.17/18 2} 41. Rd6 {(Ke3) -0.13/18 2} Be6 {-0.88/18 3} 42. Rb6 { 
-0.15/20 1} Ra7 {-0.60/18 1} 43. Ke3 {(Tb8) -0.14/19 1} f5 {(Ld5) -0.92/16 3} 
44. Rb8 {-0.03/18 4} Bd5 {(Lf7) -0.96/18 0} 45. Re8+ {(Th8) -0.11/19 12} Kf6 { 
-0.96/21 2} 46. Rf8+ {(Td8) -0.09/19 0} Rf7 {(Lf7) -1.21/17 3} 47. Rd8 { 
(Tb8) -0.20/15 1} f4+ {-1.45/17 4} 48. Kf2 {(gxf4) -0.27/19 0} Be6 { 
(fxg3+) -1.41/16 2} 49. gxf4 {(Td6) -0.36/14 2} exf4 {-2.10/16 2} 50. Rh8 { 
-0.38/17 0} Rc7 {-2.06/18 2} 51. c6 {-0.40/16 1} Rc8 {-1.61/17 1} 52. Rh7 { 
-0.43/18 1} Bd5 {-2.22/19 1} 53. Ra7 {(Td7) -0.42/19 0} g5 {(Ke6) -2.50/17 2} 
54. c7 {-0.93/16 5} Ke6 {-2.98/19 0} 55. Ra6+ {(Lb5) -0.93/17 1} Ke5 { 
-2.70/18 2} 56. hxg5 {(Lc6) -1.02/17 2} hxg5 {-2.62/21 1} 57. Bc6 {-1.05/20 0} 
Rxc7 {-2.78/20 1} 58. Bxd5 {-1.50/19 2} Kxd5 {-3.27/23 0} 59. Rg6 {-1.74/16 1} 
Rc2+ {-3.35/20 0} 60. Kf3 {(Kf1) -1.75/18 0} Rc3+ {-4.80/18 1} 61. Kf2 { 
-3.22/19 8} Rg3 {-6.10/24 0} 62. Ra6 {-3.27/19 1} Ke4 {-6.22/19 0} 63. Rxa5 { 
-3.58/20 11} Rf3+ {-8.72/22 0} 64. Kg1 {(Ke2) -3.76/18 0} g4 {-10.62/19 2} 65. 
Ra4+ {-4.03/19 1} Ke5 {(Kf5) -10.78/19 0} 66. Ra5+ {-3.93/15 1} Kf6 { 
(Ke6) -11.35/20 0} 67. b4 {(Ta4) -4.06/16 1} Rb3 {-12.60/18 1} 68. Ra8 { 
(b5) -4.19/18 0} Rxb4 {(Kf5) -20.20/18 1} 69. Rg8 {(Ta2) -#20/1 0} Rb1+ { 
-#19/1 0} 70. Kf2 {-#18/1 0} Rb2+ {-#18/1 0} 71. Kf1 {-#17/1 0} g3 {-#17/1 0} 
72. Rc8 {-#16/1 0} Kf5 {-#16/1 0} 73. Rc3 {-#15/1 0} Kg4 {-#15/1 0} 74. Rc8 { 
-#15/1 0} Rb1+ {-#14/1 0} 75. Ke2 {-#14/1 0} f3+ {-#13/1 0} 76. Ke3 {-#12/1 0} 
f2 {-#12/1 0} 77. Rg8+ {-#12/1 0} Kh3 {-#11/1 0} 78. Rh8+ {-#11/1 0} Kg2 { 
-#10/1 0} 79. Rf8 {-#10/1 0} f1=Q {-#10/12 0} 80. Rxf1 {-#9/18 1} Kxf1 {-#8/1 0 
} 81. Kd3 {-#7/1 0} Rb4 {-#7/1 0} 82. Kc3 {-#6/1 0} Rg4 {-#6/1 0} 83. Kb3 { 
-#5/1 0} g2 {-#5/1 0} 84. Kb2 {-#4/1 0} g1=Q {-#4/1 0} 85. Ka2 {-#3/1 0} Qb6 { 
-#3/1 0} 86. Ka3 {-#3/1 0} Qb5 {-#2/1 0} 87. Ka2 {-#2/1 0} Ra4# {-#1/1 0} 0-1

In my opinion "Mobility (Middle Game)=80" (default 100) and "Aggressiveness=80" (default 100)
are much better than the default setting.

ED.

Eduard Nemeth · Post by **Eduard Nemeth** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:28 pm

After any tests (games against Houdini) I prefer now fallow settings:

Code: Select all

[OPTIONS]
Mobility (Middle Game)=80
Space=80
Aggressiveness=80
Cowardice=80

CPU=Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz
GUI=Fritz 10
Ponder=ON
EGTB=GUI only
Hash=128 MB, 128 MB
Timecontrol=3m + 0s
Book=Nunn1 suite

Not bad game with this settings,
and btw Tinapa 1.01 used also too
a much better time management in this game:

[Event "Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Blitz:3'"] 
[Site "Privat"] 
[Date "2010.07.08"] 
[Round "1"] 
[White "Houdini 1.02 w32 1_CPU"] 
[Black "Tinapa 1.01"] 
[Result "1/2-1/2"] 
[ECO "B33"] 
[Annotator "0.03;-0.28"] 
[PlyCount "148"] 
[TimeControl "180"] 
 
{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz 2660 MHz W=17.8 ply; 1.508kN/ 
s B=19.3 ply; 1.036kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nb5 Nf6 
6. N1c3 d6 7. Bf4 e5 8. Bg5 a6 9. Na3 b5 10. Bxf6 gxf6 11. Nd5 f5 12. c3 Bg7 
13. exf5 Bxf5 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 14. Nc2 {0.03/16 5} Be6 {(0-0) -0.28/17 5 
} 15. Be2 {0.07/16 3} Nd4 {(0-0) -0.16/18 12} 16. Nce3 {(Scb4) 0.24/16 5} Nxe2 
{-0.12/16 7} 17. Qxe2 {0.19/19 0} O-O {-0.08/18 4} 18. O-O {0.23/18 22} f5 { 
-0.20/21 0} 19. f4 {0.21/18 9} Qb8 {(Tf7) -0.08/20 0} 20. Rf3 {(Tad1) 0.25/16 8 
} Qa7 {(Db7) -0.28/17 4} 21. Qf2 {(Dd2) 0.22/17 3} Rae8 {0.00/15 4} 22. Rd1 { 
0.19/17 2} exf4 {(Tf7) 0.00/17 4} 23. Nxf4 {(Sc2) 0.16/14 2} Bxa2 {-0.08/18 5} 
24. Rxd6 {(Tg3) 0.17/17 0} Rf7 {0.24/16 4} 25. Rd2 {(Sh5) 0.18/16 0} Bb1 { 
(Tfe7) -0.12/16 4} 26. Rg3 {(Sc2) 0.15/16 5} Kh8 {0.00/16 6} 27. Rh3 {0.11/17 2 
} b4 {(Tf6) -0.04/16 1} 28. Rd1 {0.00/13 2} Ba2 {(Le4) 0.00/16 5} 29. Qh4 { 
(Kh1) 0.03/13 4} Bf6 {-0.56/15 3} 30. Qg3 {0.00/16 0} bxc3 {(Lb3) -0.64/14 3} 
31. bxc3 {0.00/14 2} Bb3 {-0.16/17 9} 32. Rd3 {(Td6) -0.02/17 2} Rg7 { 
(Lc2) -0.32/15 3} 33. Qf2 {-0.03/15 3} Bg5 {-0.44/15 1} 34. Rf3 {-0.05/15 1} 
Rd7 {(Tge7) -0.24/15 2} 35. Rxd7 {0.00/15 2} Qxd7 {-0.56/16 0} 36. h4 { 
0.00/16 1} Bd8 {-0.40/17 4} 37. c4 {(Se2) 0.00/17 0} Bb6 {(Dd4) -0.24/18 3} 38. 
Nfd5 {0.09/16 2} Bd4 {-0.28/19 1} 39. Rxf5 {0.05/16 1} Qd6 {0.00/18 2} 40. Rf4 
{0.05/17 0} Qc5 {0.00/18 3} 41. Kh1 {(Tf7) 0.05/18 0} Bxc4 {0.00/16 3} 42. Qd2 
{0.09/19 0} Bxd5 {0.00/18 3} 43. Rxd4 {0.05/17 0} Bc6 {(Lf7) 0.00/18 2} 44. Rd8 
{(Sd5) 0.12/16 2} Rxd8 {0.00/14 3} 45. Qxd8+ {0.02/17 1} Kg7 {0.00/19 0} 46. 
Qc7+ {0.01/17 1} Kg6 {(Kf6) 0.00/18 1} 47. Qf4 {(Dg3+) 0.14/16 1} Bb7 { 
(Ld7) 0.00/17 3} 48. Ng4 {(Sc4) 0.26/16 2} Qe7 {0.00/15 2} 49. Ne5+ { 
(h5+) 0.18/17 0} Kg7 {0.00/16 2} 50. h5 {(Kg1) 0.16/17 0} Kg8 {(a5) 0.04/13 2} 
51. h6 {0.16/16 1} a5 {0.00/17 1} 52. Nc4 {0.18/17 3} Bd5 {0.00/18 0} 53. Nd6 { 
(Dg4+) 0.14/16 2} Be6 {0.00/18 2} 54. Kh2 {(Dg3+) 0.25/17 0} a4 {0.00/20 2} 55. 
Ne4 {(Dg3+) 0.27/18 0} Bf5 {0.00/19 2} 56. Ng3 {(Dxf5) 0.24/18 0} Bg6 { 
0.00/19 2} 57. Qxa4 {(Dc4+) 0.20/19 0} Qg5 {(De3) 0.00/20 2} 58. Qc4+ { 
0.18/19 2} Kf8 {0.00/23 0} 59. Qc8+ {0.15/19 1} Ke7 {0.00/23 0} 60. Qc7+ { 
0.15/20 2} Ke6 {(Kf8) 0.00/24 0} 61. Qb6+ {(Dc6+) 0.15/19 1} Kd7 { 
(Ke7) 0.00/23 1} 62. Qd4+ {0.12/19 2} Ke8 {(Ke6) 0.00/25 0} 63. Qa4+ {0.11/18 1 
} Ke7 {(Kd8) 0.00/24 0} 64. Qb4+ {0.09/18 2} Ke6 {(Kf7) 0.00/24 0} 65. Qb3+ { 
(Db6+) 0.11/18 1} Kf6 {(Ke7) 0.00/23 2} 66. Qb6+ {(Dc3+) 0.08/18 1} Kf7 { 
0.00/25 1} 67. Qa7+ {(Dc7+) 0.08/18 0} Ke6 {(Kf6) 0.00/24 2} 68. Qa6+ { 
(Db6+) 0.07/18 1} Kd7 {(Kf7) 0.00/23 2} 69. Qb7+ {0.05/19 1} Ke6 {0.00/25 0} 
70. Qc6+ {(Db3+) 0.05/19 1} Ke7 {0.00/26 2} 71. Qc3 {(Dc7+) 0.03/18 1} Qxh6+ { 
-0.12/13 1} 72. Kg1 {0.03/20 0} Qf4 {(Dg5) -0.04/16 2} 73. Ne2 {(Sh5) 0.05/17 1 
} Qd6 {-0.24/13 2} 74. Nd4 {(De3+) 0.05/16 0} Ke8 { 
adjud. (Kf8) Remis angenommen -0.16/13 2} 1/2-1/2

Good played against one of the strongest Engines of the world!

ED.

Eduard Nemeth · Post by **Eduard Nemeth** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:12 pm

DRAW ON PLAYCHESS AGAINST A FAST RYBKA 4!

(in my first game on playchess with Tinapa 1.01)

I have played with this settings, only with my core Duo 2.66 GHz and 256 MB Hash (with my account "Solist"):

Code: Select all

[OPTIONS]
Mobility (Middle Game)=80
Space=80
Aggressiveness=80
Cowardice=80

Deep Rybka 4 played on a 8 core mashine - wow!!

[Event "Wertungspartie, 16m + 0s"] 
[Site "Maschinenraum"] 
[Date "2010.07.08"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "Angler01, Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 "] 
[Black "Solist, Tinapa 1.01"] 
[Result "1/2-1/2"] 
[ECO "D11"] 
[WhiteElo "2494"] 
[Annotator "0.42;0.28"] 
[PlyCount "126"] 
[EventDate "2010.07.08"] 
[TimeControl "960"] 
 
{Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 x64: 19.8 ply; 392kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 
920 @ 2.67GHz 2666MHz, (8 threads), en-chess.ctg, 256 MB} 1. d4 {B/0 0} d5 { 
B/0 0} 2. Nf3 {B/0 0} Nf6 {B/0 0} 3. g3 {B/0 0} c6 {B/0 0} 4. Bg2 {B/0 0} Bf5 { 
B/0 0} 5. c4 {B/0 0} e6 {B/0 0} 6. O-O {B/0 0} h6 {B/0 0} 7. Nc3 {B/0 0} Be7 { 
B/0 0} 8. Qb3 {B/0 0} Qb6 {B/0 0} 9. c5 {B/0 0} Qc7 {B/0 0} 10. Bf4 {0.42/20 79 
} Qc8 {B/0 0} 11. Nd2 {0.42/20 24} O-O {B/0 0} 12. e4 {0.42/19 23} dxe4 { 
(Lf5-g6) B/0 0} 13. Ncxe4 {0.32/18 83} Bxe4 {0.28/24 21} 14. Nxe4 {0.32/19 0} 
Nxe4 {0.24/24 26} 15. Bxe4 {0.32/20 0} Nd7 {(Tf8-d8) 0.40/27 39} 16. Bc2 { 
0.34/19 51} Rd8 {0.40/24 28} 17. Rfd1 {0.33/18 15} Nf6 {(b7-b6) 0.24/24 58} 18. 
Be5 {0.31/18 72} Kf8 {(Dc8-d7) 0.24/22 34} 19. a4 {0.31/18 59} Ng4 { 
(Sf6-d5) 0.00/25 22} 20. Bf4 {0.33/19 32} Bg5 {(Sg4-f6) 0.00/28 11} 21. Bd6+ { 
0.26/17 32} Be7 {0.00/33 0} 22. Bxe7+ {0.26/18 18} Kxe7 {0.00/18 2} 23. Qc4 { 
0.22/18 24} Kf8 {(Sg4-f6) 0.00/23 22} 24. b4 { 
Solist,Tinapa 1.01 bietet Remis 0.22/20 61} a6 {(Sg4-f6) 0.00/24 32} 25. b5 { 
0.24/19 30} axb5 {0.12/25 19} 26. axb5 {0.22/21 0} Rxa1 {(Dc8-d7) 0.04/25 18} 
27. Rxa1 {0.37/16 2} Qd7 {0.04/26 18} 28. Qe2 {0.29/19 8} Nf6 {0.00/27 17} 29. 
bxc6 {0.15/20 37} bxc6 {0.00/24 19} 30. Ra4 {0.15/21 0} Qd5 {0.00/28 17} 31. 
Qe3 {0.15/19 0} Rb8 {(Dd5-h5) 0.00/27 23} 32. h3 {0.23/20 27} Rb7 { 
(Tb8-d8) 0.00/27 22} 33. Qf4 {0.24/18 21} Ke7 {0.00/29 21} 34. h4 {0.17/18 1} 
Qd7 {(Ke7-f8) 0.00/27 16} 35. Qe5 {0.21/19 24} Qd5 {0.00/29 15} 36. Qe3 { 
0.20/19 0} Ng4 {(Ke7-f8) 0.00/29 13} 37. Qd3 {0.17/20 32} Nf6 {0.00/30 12} 38. 
Qe2 {0.17/20 0} Rd7 {(Tb7-b2) 0.00/28 18} 39. Qe3 {0.16/17 14} Rb7 {0.00/28 12} 
40. Qd3 {0.13/19 0} Qd7 {(Sf6-g4) 0.00/29 15} 41. Bd1 {0.26/19 11} Ra7 { 
0.00/28 11} 42. Rxa7 {0.25/20 0} Qxa7 {0.00/23 1} 43. Bf3 {0.25/21 12} Qd7 { 
0.16/29 39} 44. Qd1 {0.24/23 0} Nd5 {(g7-g6) 0.00/27 9} 45. Qa1 {0.20/21 16} 
Nc7 {0.00/29 12} 46. Be2 {0.17/21 8} Nb5 {0.00/28 3} 47. Bxb5 {0.13/21 8} cxb5 
{0.00/28 0} 48. Qc3 {0.13/21 3} Qc6 {(Dd7-d5) 0.00/25 10} 49. Qa3 {0.16/21 9} 
Kd7 {(Ke7-e8) 0.00/25 8} 50. Qa7+ {0.16/20 8} Qc7 {0.00/25 12} 51. Qa8 { 
0.16/22 0} Ke7 {0.00/26 11} 52. Qa3 {0.16/21 0} Qc6 {0.00/27 7} 53. Qb4 { 
0.16/21 0} g5 {(Ke7-e8) 0.00/24 7} 54. h5 {0.10/21 9} Kf8 {(Ke7-d7) 0.00/25 9} 
55. Qa5 {0.09/22 10} Ke7 {0.00/30 12} 56. Qa3 {0.09/24 0} Kd7 { 
(Ke7-f6) 0.00/26 6} 57. Qb2 {0.08/22 14} e5 {(Kd7-d8) 0.00/24 10} 58. Qb3 { 
0.08/18 6} Ke7 {0.00/23 7} 59. Qe3 {0.00/20 0} Qd5 {0.00/24 8} 60. dxe5 { 
0.00/21 0} b4 {(Ke7-d7) 0.00/24 8} 61. c6 {0.01/19 6} Qxc6 {0.00/23 1} 62. Qd4 
{0.00/19 1} Qb5 {(Ke7-e6) 0.00/23 5} 63. Qd6+ {0.00/19 6} Ke8 {0.00/23 0} 
1/2-1/2

I think that my settings are not bad. Tinapa 1.01 played very solid, and found
for defending with black interesting moves...like 18...Kf8! Nice game!

ED.

mariaclara · Post by **mariaclara** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:03 pm

OT; well, in a way yes, no.

Tinapa is a Filipino fish delicacy. It's delicious smoked fish.

benstoker · Post by **benstoker** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:35 pm

Chris Formula wrote:a minor modification of Stockfish 1.8...

thanks to Tord, Marco and Joona for the well-commented top-notch source code/engine...

thanks also to Jim for the advice on compiling...

salamat,
chris

There is only one line change:

Code: Select all


// Null move dynamic reduction based on depth
-        int R = 3 + (depth >= 5 * OnePly ? depth / 8 : 0);
+        int R = 3 + (depth >= 9 ? 1 : 0) + (depth >= 15 ? 1 : 0) + (depth >= 21 ? 1 : 0) + (depth >= 27 ? 1 : 0) + (depth >= 33 ? 1 : 0) + (depth >= 39 ? 1 : 0);

Why do you think this single line change re null move reduction merits changing the name of the program? A code fork merits a name change if and when there's a significant modification of the code. This ain't anywhere close. Nevertheless, it's interesting.

BB+ · Post by **BB+** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:19 pm

OnePly is 2, I take it?

Code: Select all

          8 910 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 920 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 930 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 940 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 950 1 2
Stockfish 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9
Tinapa    3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

There is only one line change:

I guess we know what Tinapa 1.00 looked like then.

OpenChess

OpenChess

Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01

Re: Tinapa 1.01