Page 2 of 2
Re: White list
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:16 pm
by thorstenczub
Harvey Williamson wrote:Hood wrote:Thanks for proposals.
We have some engines. Not many from the top of the rating lists.
From the top engines I would add Hiarcs, Shredder, Junior and of course Fruit.
Does anyone ever wonder what the Computer Chess World would look like now if open source Fruit had not been released!?
TOP engines.
not second rank.
Re: White list
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:19 pm
by Harvey Williamson
thorstenczub wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:Hood wrote:Thanks for proposals.
We have some engines. Not many from the top of the rating lists.
From the top engines I would add Hiarcs, Shredder, Junior and of course Fruit.
Does anyone ever wonder what the Computer Chess World would look like now if open source Fruit had not been released!?
TOP engines.
not second rank.
You really are sad. Your 1st post in this thread suggests 3 great engines "'Wchess
Rebel
Mchess"
So now just to show your anger at me you now criticise them also.
Re: White list
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:31 pm
by beram
What would the computerchess world look like without Ippolit ?
Re: White list
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 7:58 pm
by thorstenczub
Harvey Williamson wrote:thorstenczub wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:Hood wrote:Thanks for proposals.
We have some engines. Not many from the top of the rating lists.
From the top engines I would add Hiarcs, Shredder, Junior and of course Fruit.
Does anyone ever wonder what the Computer Chess World would look like now if open source Fruit had not been released!?
TOP engines.
not second rank.
You really are sad. Your 1st post in this thread suggests 3 great engines "'Wchess
Rebel
Mchess"
So now just to show your anger at me you now criticise them also.
i named / suggested engines for the white list.
you suggested to name top engines.
but neither hiarcs nor junior are top engines anymore.
which part of the content is , you don't understand.
Re: White list
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:05 pm
by Harvey Williamson
thorstenczub wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:thorstenczub wrote:Harvey Williamson wrote:Hood wrote:Thanks for proposals.
We have some engines. Not many from the top of the rating lists.
From the top engines I would add Hiarcs, Shredder, Junior and of course Fruit.
Does anyone ever wonder what the Computer Chess World would look like now if open source Fruit had not been released!?
TOP engines.
not second rank.
You really are sad. Your 1st post in this thread suggests 3 great engines "'Wchess
Rebel
Mchess"
So now just to show your anger at me you now criticise them also.
i named / suggested engines for the white list.
you suggested to name top engines.
but neither hiarcs nor junior are top engines anymore.
which part of the content is , you don't understand.
okidoki you make perfect sense as always - have you published any of my private emails recently? i am glad you have found a forum to post on again.
Re: White list
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:27 pm
by thorstenczub
Harvey Williamson wrote:okidoki you make perfect sense as always - have you published any of my private emails recently? i am glad you have found a forum to post on again.
thanks harvey. its a pleasure.
Re: White list
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:39 pm
by Hood
The list is very short , still.
Does it mean that most of the programs are clones ?
If so then banning for cloning is stupid.
rgds
Hood
Re: White list
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:46 pm
by thorstenczub
mephisto III by Thomas Nitsche and Elmar Henne