it is the branch of other thread.
i think the good idea is to have 16 cores e GM
.Rgds
Hood
How to beat Corr GM ? :-)
How to beat Corr GM ? :-)
Hi,
it is the branch of other thread.
i think the good idea is to have 16 cores e GM .
Rgds
Hood
it is the branch of other thread.
i think the good idea is to have 16 cores e GM
.Rgds
Hood
Smolensk 2010. Murder or accident... Cui bono ?
There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.
There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.
Re: How to beat Corr GM ? :-)
I just lost a game against a strong OTB opponent that was running on slow hardware, the principle of the loss came from superior understanding on engine's weakness (besides chess), he caused me a severe static weakness that no engine understood.
I was aware of the problem (that I was on a possibly losing position where engines didn't know what was going on) but couldn't manage to save the game. In fact, 4 moves before I resigned, I kept going on because engines didn't know what moves were needed to win, either.
No amount of hardware or better engines would have helped. Engines are relatively happy in this possibly lost position:
And so, show incredibly close to 0.00 scores on this super-dangerous position (that black should avoid at all costs):
The game was eye opening, no analysis method that I can conceive would have helped me, but being a better OTB player with a better understanding of chess could have done it.
I find that as evidence that studying chess can be more fruitful than downloading the latest engines or upgrading your hardware.
I was aware of the problem (that I was on a possibly losing position where engines didn't know what was going on) but couldn't manage to save the game. In fact, 4 moves before I resigned, I kept going on because engines didn't know what moves were needed to win, either.
No amount of hardware or better engines would have helped. Engines are relatively happy in this possibly lost position:
And so, show incredibly close to 0.00 scores on this super-dangerous position (that black should avoid at all costs):
The game was eye opening, no analysis method that I can conceive would have helped me, but being a better OTB player with a better understanding of chess could have done it.
I find that as evidence that studying chess can be more fruitful than downloading the latest engines or upgrading your hardware.
Re: How to beat Corr GM ? :-)
DR4 SSE42 is not happy after 4 1/2 hours in my i7 Quad @3,8 GHz:
> ± (+1.27) d=25 1.a6 Ba5 2.Re3 Bb6 3.h4 Rd1 4.Kh2 Ne6 5.Rb3 c5 6.h5 (4:37:57) 8775231kN
> ± (+1.27) d=25 1.a6 Ba5 2.Re3 Bb6 3.h4 Rd1 4.Kh2 Ne6 5.Rb3 c5 6.h5 (4:37:57) 8775231kN
Re: How to beat Corr GM ? :-)
Thank you for the answer. You are right but it may be the exclusion.
From the other side there could be many c GM's which get title due to the program analysis power.
There was a person GM who wrote that he was winning due to the programm power and limited number of played games.
Rgds
Hood
From the other side there could be many c GM's which get title due to the program analysis power.
There was a person GM who wrote that he was winning due to the programm power and limited number of played games.
Rgds
Hood
Smolensk 2010. Murder or accident... Cui bono ?
There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.
There are not bugs free programms. There are programms with undiscovered bugs.
Alleluia.
Re: How to beat Corr GM ? :-)
I said "relatively" happy, 3...Rd1+ (4.Nf1!) loses by force, the engine should at least show a +5.00 for that line.Gino wrote:DR4 SSE42 is not happy after 4 1/2 hours in my i7 Quad @3,8 GHz:
> ± (+1.27) d=25 1.a6 Ba5 2.Re3 Bb6 3.h4 Rd1 4.Kh2 Ne6 5.Rb3 c5 6.h5 (4:37:57) 8775231kN