IvanHoe T52 testing

As in chess tournaments and matches...
User avatar
Matthias Gemuh
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by Matthias Gemuh »

robbolito wrote: Blitz:10' 0

1 Houdini 1.03a x64 8_CPU 3185 +6/-4/=40 52.00% 26.0/50
2 Ivanhoe 52bU-x64 3195 +4/-6/=40 48.00% 24.0/50
Hi Robbolito,

using MS Visual Studio 2008, I can easily compile you on the Windows platform.
When I try to compile Ivanhoe, I get many error messages. Can you help ?

Matthias.
Aided by engines, GMs can be very strong.
http://www.hylogic.de
User avatar
robbolito
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:48 am

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by robbolito »

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF


Best engines-5 2010

Code: Select all

                                         1                            2                            3                            
1   Ivanhoe 52bU-x64         3185   +23  15.5 - 12.514.0 - 14.0**    29.5/56
2   Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU  3190    -8  12.5 - 15.515.0 - 13.0 **   27.5/56
3   Deep Rybka 4 x64         3190   -14  14.0 - 14.013.0 - 15.0  **  27.0/56

kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by kingliveson »

A few very long games with 2GB Hash:


More long games with 512 MB Hash:


A few more long games with 256 MB Hash:


Plus a few more with 256 MB Hash:


TimeMoreWhenLosing and TimeMoreWhenWinning were checked for these game.

TimeImitateOpponent: Idea is not to fall too behind on time
TimeMoreWhenLosing: Play slower when eval score gets worse
TimeMoreWhenWinning: play slower when eval score gets better

TimeImitateOpponent and TimeMoreWhenLosing combined have been tested, and did well. Though TimeMoreWhenLosing code has changed slightly with new conditions added in latest IvanHoe. TimeMoreWhenLosing and TimeMoreWhenWinning only makes sense in very long time control games in my opinion. Used in short/blitz games, IvanHoe might get into time trouble.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Canto
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:30 am

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by Canto »

Is T52 the same as 9.52b ? You're showing two names.
User avatar
robbolito
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:48 am

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by robbolito »

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz4x @3.5 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 20.90
KNS: 10032
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF


Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

                                   
1   IvanHoe T52B.x64         3190  +4/-2/=14 55.00%   11.0/20
2   Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU  3190  +2/-4/=14 45.00%    9.0/20

kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by kingliveson »

Code: Select all

Ivanhoe v Rybka R0001, 4'/40+4'/40+4'/4  2010                 

1   IvanHoe 9.52b x64  +12/=28/-10 52.00%   26.0/50
2   Deep Rybka 4 x64   +10/=28/-12 48.00%   24.0/50
† 25 Positions (test suite)
† 3-4-5 Nalimov/Robbobase
† 128 MB Hash
† Ponder Off
† Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @ 3100 MHz
† 2 Cores
† 40/4 Repeating Time Control

Rybka
TC Buffer 3
TC Normal Move Time 100
TC Max Move Time 150

IvanHoe
Pawn Hash 16 MB


Game data available: http://chess.cygnitec.com/pgn/
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
User avatar
robbolito
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:48 am

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by robbolito »

AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor6x @ 3.2 GHz 4,096 MB Memory
Windows 7 Home Premium Edition (Build 7600)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 23.33
KNS: 11196
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: Perfect 2009 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF
Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

                                
1   Deep Rybka 4 x64      3190  +3/-1/=16 55.00%   11.0/20
2   IvanHoe 9.52b x64KLO  3190  +1/-3/=16 45.00%    9.0/20
bulldozer
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by bulldozer »

Canto wrote:Is T52 the same as 9.52b ? You're showing two names.
No. The first one is Ahmed's compile and the other one is KLO's compile, based on the same source. I think Ahmed added some eval changes on his compile.
Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by Eduard Nemeth »

Short match IvanHoe 9.52b w32 vs Houdini 1.03a w32

CPU=Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz
GUI=Fritz 10
PB=ON
Hash=128 MB, 128 MB
Timecontrol=3m + 0s
Testsuite NEW RATING LIST --> PGN see here:

http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php ... 79&start=0

Download:

http://www.mediafire.com/file/xgr7v5ka2s7l2t0/NewHRR.7z

Result after first 5 variations (from the 60 Variations) = 10 games.

Code: Select all

Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, Blitz 3m + 0s

                             1234567890
1   IvanHoe 9.52b w32 (used 1-core)            ½½011½½½½½    5.5/10
2   Houdini 1.03a w32 2_CPU (used 1-core)      ½½100½½½½½    4.5/10
I sopped the match after 10 games, then In my opinion, both engine play equally (Both engines have the same strength) - Only my opinion! Currently best game in my eyes was this:

PGN:



ED.
Peace be with you!
User avatar
robbolito
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:48 am

Re: IvanHoe T52 testing

Post by robbolito »

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 4CPU 960 3.20GHz8x @ 4.005 GHz with 4,096 MB Memory
Microsoft Windows XP 64 Bit Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Fritz Benchmark:
Speed: 24.98
KNS: 11988
GUI: CB Rybka 3
Book: HS 10 moves
Hash: 256
RB and TB: ON
Ponder: OFF

Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

                                   12345678901234
1   IvanHoe 9.52b alpha x64  3190   ½½½1½½½½0½1½½½   7.5/14
2   Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU  3190  ½½½0½½½½1½0½½½    6.5/14

Experimental version.
Post Reply