deeds wrote: Thu May 01, 2025 8:45 am
At SedatChess, engines obtain the same statistics under different conditions !
Exemple with Stockfish 020425 (7 elo / 8 elo, 51.1% / 51.0%) :
And it was the same lottery for Omega MPV (6 elo / 6 elo, 50.8% / 51.0%), Artemis 12TR (-3 elo / -2 elo, 49.5% / 49.7%)...
Another opening but same tourney's conditionsThis time, which engine lost the SedatChess lottery ?
At SedatChess, when an engine lost more than 60 elo, here is the explanation of the clown Sedat :
Sedat wrote:
...unusual...
...Omega MPV is last...
...any ideas over these issues...
...small data...
...such mystery...
...Very strange really...
...Omega MPV did not like...
botunnet wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 9:27 am
At SedatChess, when an engine lost more than 60 elo, here is the explanation of the clown Sedat :
Sedat wrote:
...unusual...
...Omega MPV is last...
...any ideas over these issues...
...small data...
...such mystery...
...Very strange really...
...Omega MPV did not like...
The game results have absolutely no credibility it's a blunder's lottery ! The rankings have absolutely no credibility but hey it's just for FUN ! The tournament conditions are useless SedatChess is a circus and Sedat is a clown !
Since you are the author of many proven lies and regularly display your ignorance about learning features / engine's trainers / EXP files / learning engines, if I stop responding to you, I am curious to see what will happen... Good luck !
SedatCheat wrote:
...missed to mention my books...Sedat Canbaz's book releases Are NOT mentioned...they forget to mention that I am book author...be missed on Deeds list...my chess activities are tried to be Underestimated...
supernova wrote:
...I think Sedat's logic is flawed...
...Testing derivative engines against the same, very similar engine is a waste of power and CPU...
Other people still doesn't see that SedatChess is a circus :
Igbo wrote:
...Another thing I don't understand, and I've known him (=Sedat) for over 20 years, is the use of that Raubfish in book tournaments. I've analyzed many games a long time ago, and it gave a clear advantage, but that engine (=Raubfish) didn't, and many games were lost...
...Sedat is a friend, but sometimes, like all of us, he closes his eyes...
deeds wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 7:41 pm
Then, without answers and lacking views, we can bet that he will bring out his old Depth4 attractions to save his circus...
How is it that the most important actors of the chess community already have several EXP Depth4 files, while Sedat has none ?
MZ :
How is it that after so many failures, Sedat still believes that he will be able to match the EXP file's accuracy by creating a BIN book from training games ?
Why compare a BIN book and an EXP file when we don't have the EXP file ?
How is it that after 20 years of optimization, Sedat's own book also collapses quickly/easily ?
Perfect 2023 :
How is it that Sedat is as affected as the books are harmless to the engine's training ?
What's the point of testing a BIN book created from EXP file's training games without using the openings used in training that EXP file ?
How is it that Sedat fans say what they really think of him in restricted channels ?
supernova :
igbo :