Re: when a daily tester should review his tests

General discussion about computer chess...
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester should review his tests

Post by deeds »

------------

:!: Notice:

This post in this topic has been reviewed and edited because it violated the OpenChess Forum Rules. This is a gentle reminder not to continue flaming this topic or others in the Forum. Further recurrent violations will not be tolerated.

Thanks,

Best regards, Moderation.

------------

Sedat Canbaz wrote: Where Depth4 2015 book is tuned to Prefer both Depth 2025's Exp series..

Deeds, who seems to be Responsible for all the openings (played by Depth4..)
source


To get a good variety of experience data, I train Eman on several opening lists with several opening books as sparring-partners :

Image

Image

Image


How it works ?

For each opening of each opening list, the GUI (arena, cutechess, etc.) plays the opening moves then the engines start to play from the last position.

Let's take a training game played from the "1.b3 Nimzovich-Larsen" opening of the "20 first moves" list :

[Event "EXP VS BOOK"]
[Site "dual xeon e5-2660v3"]
[Date "2025.02.12"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Depth4_120824 (Eman 8.40)"]
[Black "Brain_110323 (Eman 8.40)"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A01"]
[GameDuration "00:02:48"]
[Opening "Nimzovich-Larsen attack"]
[PlyCount "55"]
[TimeControl "60+1"]
[Variation "Classical Variation"]

1. b3 {book} d5 2. Nf3 {0.00/29 4.1s} Bf5 3. Bb2 {-0.09/22 1.0s} e6
4. c4 {-0.05/29 10s} c6 {-0.13/31 12s} 5. e3 {-0.04/29 4.1s} Nd7 {-0.10/33 3.9s}
6. Nc3 {-0.08/26 1.8s} Ngf6 {-0.01/31 6.3s} 7. Nh4 {-0.07/26 1.5s}
Bg4 {-0.05/33 2.9s} 8. Be2 {-0.13/25 1.1s} Bxe2 {-0.02/30 1.0s}
9. Qxe2 {-0.15/27 5.1s} Nc5 {-0.02/31 2.1s} 10. cxd5 {-0.04/26 0.81s}
Nxd5 {-0.02/30 2.2s} 11. Nf3 {0.00/27 1.4s} Nxc3 {0.00/30 1.9s}
12. Bxc3 {+0.05/27 1.1s} f6 {0.00/28 1.7s} 13. Qc4 {+0.16/23 1.5s}
Qd5 {0.00/26 1.6s} 14. Ke2 {+0.01/23 1.3s} O-O-O {+0.13/20 1.3s}
15. g4 {0.00/24 2.6s} Qd7 {0.00/29 1.3s} 16. Bd4 {0.00/36 1.9s}
Kb8 {0.00/38 1.4s} 17. g5 {0.00/39 3.6s} e5 {0.00/46 1.9s}
18. Bxc5 {0.00/44 1.2s} Bxc5 {0.00/46 1.6s} 19. Qxc5 {0.00/48 3.4s}
Qd3+ {0.00/48 1.8s} 20. Kd1 {0.00/50 1.7s} Qe4 {0.00/48 1.6s}
21. Ke2 {0.00/53 3.7s} Qd3+ {0.00/52 10.0s} 22. Ke1 {0.00/55 5.2s}
Qe4 {0.00/56 2.4s} 23. gxf6 {0.00/58 16s} gxf6 {0.00/56 2.4s}
24. Ke2 {0.00/61 1.7s} Qd3+ {0.00/56 1.6s} 25. Kd1 {0.00/57 3.4s}
Qe4 {0.00/58 2.1s} 26. Ke2 {0.00/60 0.49s} Qd3+ {0.00/60 13s}
27. Kd1 {0.00/62 2.8s} Qe4 {0.00/64 4.9s}
28. Ke2 {0.00/61 0.64s, Draw by 3-fold repetition} 1/2-1/2

In this training game,

- the move "1. b3 {book}" is played by the GUI,
- the move "1. ... d5" comes from the "Brain_110323" BIN book,
- the move "2. Nf3 {0.00/29 4.1s}" is evaluated by the "Eman 8.40" engine which will update the "Depth4_120824" EXP file,
- the move "4. ... c6 {-0.13/31 12s}" is evaluated by the "Eman 8.40" engine because the "Brain_110323" BIN book is out-of-book,
-etc.


- no move played as white comes from the "Depth4_120824" EXP file because at training the "experience book" option is set to false. The moves are evaluated by the "Eman 8.40" engine based on the missing experience data in the "Depth4_120824" EXP file,
- only the moves played as black without evaluation represent the "Brain_110323" BIN book,


In sum :
- training games don't represent the accuracy of the EXP file,
- opening moves played by the GUI don't represent the EXP file,
- moves evaluated by the engine don't represent the EXP file,
- If a clown creates an opening book from training games, he alone is responsible for the good or bad performance of his own opening book.
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester should review his tests

Post by deeds »

------------

:!: Notice:

This post in this topic has been reviewed and edited because it violated the OpenChess Forum Rules. This is a gentle reminder not to continue flaming this topic or others in the Forum. Further recurrent violations will not be tolerated.

Thanks,

Best regards, Moderation.

------------

Sedat Canbaz wrote: ...I will create a book, which will be tuned to prefer Depth4 Exp Series, played in latest months of 2025 !...
source

Reality :
Image

Image

Image
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by deeds »

Umpteenth Sedat's lie :
Sedat wrote: ...About MZ Chess Forum, which is closed too...
source

Evidence :
Image
source
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 2289
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

@ To All Honest People

The closed MZ chess forum and Outskirts forum are totally two
Different forums, it's clear again and again that deeds lies are on!
Or deeds is not aware that before Outskirts, there was MZ forum..

And what I said before to all people?
Deeds is even not amateur..he started to be active since 2021,
Actually 3 (three) years is a serious period..but here.. OOPS ))
Anyhow, never too late to learn and to train...all in our hands )

Greetings
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by deeds »

Now, let's talk about (Sedat's) amateurism in learning engines / EXP files :

Image

Oops !
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 2289
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

@ To All Honest People

OOPS ) I was referring simply that
Deeds was in testings since 2021

And as next time, as reference,
Deeds should share his played games, right ?
Otherwise, will be just madness to talk over!

Actually how funny is that too,
Let's say Deeds was so active even before 2020,
Then only beginners will be not aware that MZ
Forum was available in those times.. but for this
A little bit brain is required or I suggest to Deeds
To eat 'walnut' due beneficial for amnesia illnesses..

Greetings )
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by deeds »

Sedat wrote: ...Let's say Deeds was so active even before 2020...
Reminder :

Image

Try again !
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 2289
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

@ To All Honest People

We see only Deeds crosstable, papers..
But what about all the played games? NO
And why? it seems in 2017-2020 years, he was
So new in testings.. and he played the tests
As without saving games ?) who knows ?)

In other words,
Once more we noticed that via his postings:
He is even NOT a amateur in Eng testings!
Ony BLA BLA BLA...

Plus what Deeds is tried to fool again all?
SCCT/Sedat has no any serious EXP tests..
Here I totally disagree with Deeds, due to
SCCT's huge data (via all games) available!
Where Deeds did not share all his games!!
If I miss, please correct Me..but via games!
Yes..I see only papers but what about facts?

And let's say he shared all these games, but
How much these handicapped games are useful?
I am sure not for many people..as main reason,
Who cares much about Fiat 1980 model car ?)

If still not so clear about Deeds system,
Imagine you work for old-dated model car,
Where you paint each part min 500 times )
In the end..just waste of time..because
This painted car will remain still old dated!

Btw, why Deeds is staying far away from trend,
Latest model cars? In my opinion, simply due to
He is interested only in gold antique collection!
But I think he misses 1 (one) important point:
All that glitters is not gold!

Greetings )
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester lies to people...

Post by deeds »

Sedat wrote: ...But what about all the played games? NO
...And why? he played the tests As without saving games ?)...
These games were shared with the collective of honest people :

Image
-
Image
-
Image

Sedat did not receive them :arrow: Oops ! :lol:
User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: when a daily tester should review his tests

Post by deeds »

------------

:!: Notice:

This post in this topic has been reviewed and edited because it violated the OpenChess Forum Rules. This is a gentle reminder not to continue flaming this topic or others in the Forum. Further recurrent violations will not be tolerated.

Thanks,

Best regards, Moderation.

------------


Reminder :
deeds wrote: Thu Mar 27, 2025 9:46 am Now, let's talk about (Sedat's) amateurism in learning engines / EXP files :

Image
Post Reply