How about we have a little laugh ?

[sarona]

When at SedatChess they claim that a SF clone targeted for correspondence analysis (=Corchess) is the best engine out there for tournanent play at bullet time controls (=TC 15 sec + 300 ms) :

I see.

So by this, we are to assume that Stockfish development has regressed 14 Elo (only 1008 games using UHO book) since November 22, 2024? For the uninformed, Alex's SF-PB is Stockfish with polyglot book code added. No other modifications to the source.

I will believe Stefan Pohl's testing any day compared to this thing. The reason? See here (right on, Viz )
viewtopic.php?f=38&p=38990#p38974

[deeds]

So by this, we are to assume that Stockfish development has regressed 14 Elo (only 1008 games using UHO book) since November 22, 2024 ?
For the uninformed, Alex's SF-PB is Stockfish with polyglot book code added. No other modifications to the source.

I am not convinced that this TD has realized its own contradictions :
- engine optimized for correspondence games better than stockfish at bullet
- engine optimized for UHO openings list (=low draw rate) better with UNIQUE openings list (=high draw rate)
- etc

Here are the best TD statements to make your day :

...
Sure in slower TC, situation is unpredictable
...
No much ways to appear blunder moves
...
Because without the clever fool guys, our hobby would not be boring ?
...
Such as everything, related that ends as draw is bad, not good Sorry to say,
but what kind of sick mentality can be of that ?
...
stop running your silly games on your own PCs,
because I think also that It's totally a waste of time
...

sources : #1, #2