Ivanhoe T55 games

[robbolito]

Q9550-XP64, Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

1   IvanHoe T55.x64   3185  +8/-4/=28 55.00%   22.0/40
2   Deep Rybka 4 x64  3190  +4/-8/=28 45.00%   18.0/40

[kingliveson]

Can you run the same test using the sudden death time control posted here: http://www.open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=377

Thanks

[robbolito]

Qi7- 960 XP.x64, Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

1   IvanHoe T55 I7.x64  3185  +7/-2/=11 62.50%   12.5/20
2   Deep Rybka 4 x64    3150  +2/-7/=11 37.50%    7.5/20

[robbolito]

So far I have 90 games and the final score between the Ivanhoe 55 and Rybka 4 is 22-9 and 61 draws on 2 different quads.
So it is becoming very clear that Rybka is not number one program anymore.Ivanhoe programmers have done their job well.
It is the rule of the free engines like Ivanhoe and Houdini and probably next version of Stockfish.

Q9550-XP64, Blitz:10' 0
Hash:512
Book: Perfect 2009- 10 moves.
GUI: CB
RBs and TBs : ON

Code: Select all

1   IvanHoe 55mU-x64  3185  +7/-3/=20 56.67%   17.0/30
2   Deep Rybka 4 x64  3190  +3/-7/=20 43.33%   13.0/30

[robbolito]

Q9550-XP64, Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

1   IvanHoe 55mU-x64        3185  +7/-4/=29 53.75%   21.5/40
2   Houdini 1.02 x64 4_CPU  3190  +4/-7/=29 46.25%   18.5/40

[robbolito]

Q9550-XP64, Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

1   IvanHoe T55.x64         3185  +6/-3/=21 55.00%   16.5/30
2   Houdini 1.02 x64 4_CPU  3190  +3/-6/=21 45.00%   13.5/30

[yanquis1972]

silver suite 2x

2min/40 moves 1min/20moves increments after that

1 Deep Rybka 4 +47/=111/-42 51.25% 102.5/200 +8
2 IvanHoe T55 x64 +42/=111/-47 48.75% 97.5/200 -8

2CPU each ponder off

DR4 used 100NM 150MM, all else default. ivanhoe used 16MB pawn hash & robbobases, all else default.

[robbolito]

Qi7- 960 XP.x64, Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

                              1234567890
1   IvanHoe T63Di7.x64  3190   ½1½½½1½½1½   6.5/10
2   Deep Rybka 4 x64    3185  ½0½½½0½½0½    3.5/10

[robbolito]

AMD-X6.x64 Blitz:10', Blitz:10' 0

Code: Select all

                                  1234567890
1   Ivanhoe-B 55mPPmPopcnt  3195   ½0½½½½½1½½   5.0/10  25.00
2   Deep Rybka 4 x64        3190  ½1½½½½½0½½    5.0/10  25.00

[Tomcass]

TESTING NEW COMPILES OF IVANHOE
240 games

TEST 1

Quad 2.33
Gui: Fritz 12
Ponder: Off
No Triple or Robbo Bases
Book: HS Masterbook 2
Time Control: 5 min+ 1 sec.
2010-07Ivan55bPeterpan2-2 2010
4 cores
120 games

1 2 3 4
1 Ivanhoe-B 55mPPsse3w32 10.5 - 9.5 10.5 - 9.5 12.0 - 8.0 33.0/60
2 Ivanhoe-B57d_11_w32(x4)Bill 9.5 - 10.5 10.0 - 10.0 11.0 - 9.0 30.5/60
3 Houdini 1.02 w32 4_CPU 9.5 - 10.5 10.0 - 10.0 10.0 - 10.0 29.5/60
4 Deep Rybka 4 w32 8.0 - 12. 09.0 - 11.0 10.0 - 10.0 27.0/60



TEST 2.
I7 975
Gui: Fritz 12
Ponder: Off
No Triple or Robbo Bases
Book: HS Masterbook 2
Time Control: 5 min+ 1 sec.
4 cores and 8 threads
120 games

201007IvanPeterpanB55-1 2010

1 2 3 4
1 Deep Rybka 4 x64 10.5 - 9.5 11.5 - 8.5 10.5 - 9.5 32.5/60
2 Ivanhoe-B 55mPPsse4.2(x8) 9.5 - 10.5 12.0 - 8.0 11.0 - 9.0 32.5/60 0.00
3 Houdini DEVEL x64 8_CPU 8.5 - 11.5 8.0 - 12.0 11.0 - 9.0 27.5/60 0.00
4 Ivanhoe-B57d_11_w32(x8)Bill 9.5 - 10.5 9.0 - 11.0 9.0 - 11.0 27.5/60 0.00

GLOBAL RESULTS:
1 Ivanhoe-B 55mPP 65,5/120
4 Deep Rybka 4 59,5/120
3 Ivanhoe-B57d_11_w32_Bill 58,0/120
4 Houdini 1.02 57,0/120

COMMENTS.

PeterPan’s compile is extremely strong in my slower computer and very strong in my faster i7.
Bill’s compile performs very well in my slower computer with a w32 environment, but not so well in i7 because it works with w32 and all other engines works with w64. (Speed handicap about 40%).

Regards from Barcelona.

Tom.