Hello Dear Friends )
Well, here are new strength tests for future Book tours..
My mission is very simple: to find less Drawish engines..
Sure I refer for latest Top engines which are
3800+ Elo!
1st test: RemsEXP via its default EvalFile..where
SF-PB 220324 SC played via nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue
And again and again +6 Elo difference (in favor for SC)
E.g a few days ago..exactly same Elo diff. is recorded!
Code: Select all
1 SF-PB 220324 SC +48/-29/=969 50.91% 532.5/1046
2 RemsEXP 160824 def +29/-48/=969 49.09% 513.5/1046
DrawRatio: 92%, not so high, since played via strong lines!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2nd test: RemsEXP SC via nn-86aaa607b31b.nnue..where
SF-PB 220324 SC is played via nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue too
But this time, it seems Evalfile influence played role
As we see +1 Elo difference (in favor for RemsEXP SC)
Code: Select all
1 RemsEXP 160824 SC +37/-35/=1000 50.09% 537.0/1072
2 SF-PB 220324 SC +35/-37/=1000 49.91% 535.0/1072
DrawRatio: 93%, still acceptable, cause via other engines
Are expecting to be appeared much more draws for sure !
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3rd test: the target to test which are different in NN styles!
But in same time to be very close in strength..this is not all,
And same time the target is also that to be not so drawish each!!
SF-PB 220324 SC = nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue
SF-POLY 020624 SC = nn-ab69aa4c1cd8.nnue
Code: Select all
1 SF-POLY 020624 SC +60/-59/=1229 50.04% 674.5/1348
2 SF-PB 220324 SC +59/-60/=1229 49.96% 673.5/1348
DrawRatio: 91%, the lowest record produced.. just great !!
As other good news that they are identical in performance!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GAMES:
https://mega.nz/file/OgxHGLqY#18tOt-3ww ... XEHY7DQ5U4
Conditions:
2x Epyc 7B12, CuteChess1.2.0, 1 Core, Ponder OFF, 30s+0.5s, Balsa/Unique, 64 Hash, 5-MEN
As final words,
You may know, only who are with 'weak characters' blame the strong
Opening theory... yes..it's all in out hands, as we know also that
Climbing to Everest is a very hard work..but otherwise..if preferring
The easy roads..can't be remained as unforgettable records, right ?
Because some programmers, when can't find how to improve..often
Accuse, blame the strong openings.. but via latest tours, test etc.
I demonstrated (even as non-programmer) that everything is possible!
Yes..all these tests are useful..but anyhow I'm still not much satisfied...
Because just in case BIN vs CTG matches: may appear high draw values!
Ok..in next days, I will see again what I can do...Btw, what about you ?)
E.g can you help here please regarding
3800+ via BIN+CTG future and
In same time to be not so Drawish each other..let's say close to
90% draws?
Cause so far especially 3800+ CTG future ones are much more Drawish each other...
Thanks in advance
Ok.. that's all for now see you later )
Greetings