Hazard Engines
Re: Hazard Engines
+1Sedat Canbaz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 4:38 amThank you so much!OrgZ wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 1:36 amHazard JigSaw v5.8
https://www.mediafire.com/file/x9l9y4a1 ... .8.7z/file
Re: Hazard Engines
OrgZ wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2024 1:36 amHazard JigSaw v5.8
https://www.mediafire.com/file/x9l9y4a1 ... .8.7z/file
-
- Posts: 1978
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: Hazard Engines
Adrian OlivaOrgZ wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 1:06 amTest by Mr Adrian Oliva
Hazard JigSaw v5.7_avx2 vs. SF PB 230524 AVX2
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Stockfish PB: nn-c721dfca8cd3.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue - Hazard: B11.evL and B8.evL
Book Settings:
1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 3min+1seg 0
1 JigSaw v5.7_avx2 +1 +2/=498/-0 50.20% 251.0/500
2 SF PB 230524 AVX2 -1 +0/=498/-2 49.80% 249.0/500
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/zrvsrw85 ... 5.pgn/file
Congratulations OrgZ!
Deep Blue-20240518-assassin vs. JigSaw v5.7_avx2
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Fire Green Opening Suite ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces - Hazard: B11.evL and B8.evL - Deep Blue: nn-4b16c1a49e64.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue
Book Settings:
1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-8
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 3min+1seg 0
1 Deep Blue-20240518-assassin +1 +2/=498/-0 50.20% 251.0/500
2 JigSaw v5.7_avx2 -1 +0/=498/-2 49.80% 249.0/500
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/pngzap2g ... 7.pgn/file
Adrian Oliva
Congratulations Deep Blue! (Unknown author)
Hazard JigSaw v5.8_avx2 (OrgZ) vs. SF PB 120624 AVX2 (Skynet)
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: GM Test Book v3 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces - NNUE: Stockfish PB: nn-ddcfb9224cdb.nnue and nn-37f18f62d772.nnue - Hazard Jigaw 5.8: B12tz.evL and B7tz.evL
Book Settings:
1.Tournament UNCHECKED
2.Min games 3-35
3.Variety of play 215
4.Influence of learn 0
5.Learning strength 0
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 3min+1seg 0
1 SF PB 120624 AVX2 +5 +15/=477/-8 50.70% 253.5/500
2 JigSaw v5.8_avx2 -5 +8/=477/-15 49.30% 246.5/500
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/oo5td5uh ... 2.pgn/file
Congratulations Skynet!
Sedat Canbaz
Yes...SF-PB wins again..!! Congrats to Skynet and SF team!
I congratulate OrgZ too! No One can be always Number One!
Because any one may go down, but this is also true that as
Most important achievement is to get back up again, right?
On the other hand,
Once more we noticed that Skynet's SF-PB engine is very
Strong, powerful.. fully deserves to be called 'Born to Win'!
Meanwhile, (for anyone missed) according to overall stats:
SF-PB has many records as Number One..that means a lot!
Of course, as same words are going for OrgZ's engines too!
Be aware of that too,
In Duel matches: Champions titles are not given, as reasons:
Due to small contests (only 2 players, small number of games),
Anyhow I think these kind of Duels are worth to be organized,
Otherwise, if all tours were same, chess would not be boring?
Sure not good idea to run only Duels, because if running often:
It's not a very effective way to test all other Top chess engines,
But no doubt via Ratings (many players + games) provide much
More useful info about determining who is best, sure I respect
Other Testers as well, but not all of us have similar hardware,
Much free time etc. Btw, is that all enough ? not of course.. )
What I can say more,
Current Duel's database seems to be really not bad in quality!
Besides, there are not so many games out... I mean played
Under similar cond. such as on same, fast CPU machine etc.
But I admit too that the current draw percentage is high (95%),
As reasons: played MP, Blitz, Ponder ON..actually you know,
There are some ways to reduce the draws, e.g switching to
Much weaker openings, but just in case it's as lottery,mystery..
To see which one is stronger e.g in 300 games (per player),
Other reasonable alternatives are e.g we have to use 1 Core,
Bullet, Ponder OFF..or playing vs weaker opponents, then
The Draws are expecting to go down as well...or switching to
Directly to old, slow hardwares..then we'll see less Draws too
Ok...too many comments ) and here are the Duel's results:
Code: Select all
1 SF-PB 120624 +10/-4/=286 51.00% 153.0/300
2 C-Dragon v3.0 +4/-10/=286 49.00% 147.0/300
GAMES:
https://mega.nz/file/ykoygSTb#oMKfyrp09 ... tOTyCi7y6o
Best,
Sedat
-
- Posts: 1978
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: Hazard Engines
Thank you very much