Stockfish
Re: Stockfish
Author: xoto10
Date: Wed May 29 19:04:57 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717002297
Add compensation factor to adjust extra time according to time control
As stockfish nets and search evolve, the existing time control appears
to give too little time at STC, roughly correct at LTC, and too little
at VLTC+.
This change adds an adjustment to the optExtra calculation. This
adjustment is easy to retune and refine, so it should be easier to keep
up-to-date than the more complex calculations used for optConstant and
optScale.
Passed STC 10+0.1:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 169568 W: 43803 L: 43295 D: 82470 Elo +1.04
Ptnml(0-2): 485, 19679, 44055, 19973, 592
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27da9fa
Yellow LTC 60+0.6:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 209970 W: 53087 L: 52914 D: 103969 Elo +0.29
Ptnml(0-2): 91, 19652, 65314, 19849, 79
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27daaa0
Passed VLTC 180+1.8 :
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 85618 W: 21735 L: 21342 D: 42541 Elo +1.59
Ptnml(0-2): 15, 8267, 25848, 8668, 11
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27db95f
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5297
Bench: 1212167
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Date: Wed May 29 19:04:57 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717002297
Add compensation factor to adjust extra time according to time control
As stockfish nets and search evolve, the existing time control appears
to give too little time at STC, roughly correct at LTC, and too little
at VLTC+.
This change adds an adjustment to the optExtra calculation. This
adjustment is easy to retune and refine, so it should be easier to keep
up-to-date than the more complex calculations used for optConstant and
optScale.
Passed STC 10+0.1:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 169568 W: 43803 L: 43295 D: 82470 Elo +1.04
Ptnml(0-2): 485, 19679, 44055, 19973, 592
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27da9fa
Yellow LTC 60+0.6:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 209970 W: 53087 L: 52914 D: 103969 Elo +0.29
Ptnml(0-2): 91, 19652, 65314, 19849, 79
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27daaa0
Passed VLTC 180+1.8 :
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 85618 W: 21735 L: 21342 D: 42541 Elo +1.59
Ptnml(0-2): 15, 8267, 25848, 8668, 11
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27db95f
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5297
Bench: 1212167
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Re: Stockfish
Author: Viren6
Date: Thu May 30 14:34:24 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717072464
Add extension condition to cutoffCnt
Decrease cutoffCnt increment by 1 if extension is 2 or greater.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 8cefa8d34d
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 99200 W: 25703 L: 25297 D: 48200 Elo +1.42
Ptnml(0-2): 253, 11660, 25390, 12022, 275
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 8cefa8d411
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 124530 W: 31659 L: 31161 D: 61710 Elo +1.39
Ptnml(0-2): 58, 13578, 34489, 14088, 52
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5310
bench 1623228
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Date: Thu May 30 14:34:24 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717072464
Add extension condition to cutoffCnt
Decrease cutoffCnt increment by 1 if extension is 2 or greater.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 8cefa8d34d
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 99200 W: 25703 L: 25297 D: 48200 Elo +1.42
Ptnml(0-2): 253, 11660, 25390, 12022, 275
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 8cefa8d411
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 124530 W: 31659 L: 31161 D: 61710 Elo +1.39
Ptnml(0-2): 58, 13578, 34489, 14088, 52
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5310
bench 1623228
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am
Re: Stockfish
Linux compilations only at abrok.
For others see here:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... 0-a77a895c
For others see here:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... 0-a77a895c
Peace be with you!
Re: Stockfish
Author: Joost VandeVondele
Date: Thu May 30 23:07:25 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717103245
Fix cross from Linux to Windows
specifies Windows 7 required
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/p ... w=msvc-170
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5319
No functional change
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Date: Thu May 30 23:07:25 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717103245
Fix cross from Linux to Windows
specifies Windows 7 required
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/p ... w=msvc-170
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5319
No functional change
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Re: Stockfish
Hi, has the SlowMover parameter been removed?
Re: Stockfish
From Stefan Pohl:Homayoun wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2024 4:06 pmAuthor: Shahin M. Shahin
Date: Sun May 26 20:32:41 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1716748361
Remove rootDelta branch
This makes rootDelta logic easier to understand, recalculating the value
where it belongs so removes an unnecessary branch.
Passed non-regression STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27d8d8e
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 206016 W: 53120 L: 53089 D: 99807 Elo +0.05
Ptnml(0-2): 591, 20928, 59888, 21061, 540
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5289
No functional change
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Wow ! This is not good...
”Latest Website-News (2024/06/02): Testrun of Stockfish 240526 finished: 0 Celo to Stockfish 240519, and sadly a measureable regression in EAS-scoring (nearly -20000 EAS points !)”
Thank you Stefan !
Re: Stockfish
Can I have an explanatory team?ZamChess wrote: ↑Sun Jun 02, 2024 8:02 amFrom Stefan Pohl:Homayoun wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2024 4:06 pmAuthor: Shahin M. Shahin
Date: Sun May 26 20:32:41 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1716748361
Remove rootDelta branch
This makes rootDelta logic easier to understand, recalculating the value
where it belongs so removes an unnecessary branch.
Passed non-regression STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... d5e27d8d8e
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 206016 W: 53120 L: 53089 D: 99807 Elo +0.05
Ptnml(0-2): 591, 20928, 59888, 21061, 540
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5289
No functional change
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Wow ! This is not good...
”Latest Website-News (2024/06/02): Testrun of Stockfish 240526 finished: 0 Celo to Stockfish 240519, and sadly a measureable regression in EAS-scoring (nearly -20000 EAS points !)”
Thank you Stefan !
Re: Stockfish
Finaly LTC test of current version against the strongest one from May according to progression tests.
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 1ad1c54f4b
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 1ad1c54f4b
Re: Stockfish
Author: Tomasz Sobczyk
Date: Mon Jun 3 08:54:24 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717397664
Fix GetProcessGroupAffinity call
`GetProcessGroupAffinity` appears to require 4 byte alignment for `GroupArray` memory.
See https://stackoverflow.com/q/78567676 for further information
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5340
No functional change
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Date: Mon Jun 3 08:54:24 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717397664
Fix GetProcessGroupAffinity call
`GetProcessGroupAffinity` appears to require 4 byte alignment for `GroupArray` memory.
See https://stackoverflow.com/q/78567676 for further information
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5340
No functional change
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Re: Stockfish
Author: cj5716
Date: Sat Jun 8 23:40:22 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717882822
Make repeated bench runs identical
fixes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... ssues/5376
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5377
No functional changes
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/
Date: Sat Jun 8 23:40:22 2024 +0200
Timestamp: 1717882822
Make repeated bench runs identical
fixes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... ssues/5376
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5377
No functional changes
https://abrok.eu/stockfish/