Hazard Engines

[Homayoun]

Hazard JigSaw v4.40



https://pixeldrain.com/u/jiRYXi2K

Thank you very much, Tanick.
Greetings

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hazard JigSaw v4.40



https://pixeldrain.com/u/jiRYXi2K

Thank you very much, Tanick.
Greetings

+1

And it's nice to see Eng releases such as 1 MB (in size)

Greetings

[Ghppn]

Thank you very much, Tanick!

[OrgZ]

You are welcome chess friends

[minutka15]

Tanick Thank you for the nice job! Here are only positive impressions,
So thats why i made your engines collection:
Easy to install without using gui, just check from checkboxes and click to install button, thats all.
The CHECKED engines will be installed to folder:

"C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\ChessBase\Engines.UCI\Tanick_Ramz"


Best regards to ALL !

https://pixeldrain.com/u/dYAgR3kL

[OrgZ]

Tanick Thank you for the nice job! Here are only positive impressions,
So thats why i made your engines collection:
Easy to install without using gui, just check from checkboxes and click to install button, thats all.
These engines will be installed to folder:

"C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\ChessBase\Engines.UCI\Tanick_Ramz"


Best regards to ALL !


Tanick_Ramz_Collection.png


https://pixeldrain.com/u/dYAgR3kL

Thank you dear Minutka15

[OrgZ]

TEST BY Adrian

Hazard JigSaw v4.40_avx2 vs. SF-PRO 27-02-2024

Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Hazard: nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue

Book Settings:

1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500

DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0


1 JigSaw v4.40_avx2 +1 +1/=499/-0 50.10% 250.5/500
2 SF-PRO -1 +0/=499/-1 49.90% 249.5/500

Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/mmvpvjaf ... 5.pgn/file

Congratulations OrgZ!

[APOCALYPSE]

TEST BY Adrian

Hazard JigSaw v4.40_avx2 vs. SF-PRO 27-02-2024

Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Hazard: nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue

Book Settings:

1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500

DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0


1 JigSaw v4.40_avx2 +1 +1/=499/-0 50.10% 250.5/500
2 SF-PRO -1 +0/=499/-1 49.90% 249.5/500

Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/mmvpvjaf ... 5.pgn/file

Congratulations OrgZ!

Hello OrgZ,

You yourself should understand perfectly well that winning one game is not a victory, besides, 500 games to check is also very little — if the gap was two, three or more winning games, then I would absolutely agree to lose, and just one game of advantage can hardly be called a victory.

Best regards.

[Homayoun]

Hello@ Apocalypse
Take it easy. All of us know that all the tests in chess forums are considered as fun tests although we like them very much , consider them with great appreciation and respect. Also all of us know that the difference between strength of stockfish and all it’s derivatives is almost near the epsilon. All of them are very very strong and valuable. Also we know that fluctuation is the nature of all derivatives and non of them are stable as stockfish itself. For example we see one version of shashchess is very strong and wins all derivatives tournaments, then the next version is
Almost weak comparing with other derivatives. This fact is seen for all derivatives: Eman, Brainlearn, Hazard , SFpro and others. Also all of us know the value of authors and developers works, like you, Tanick, Anton and others. So, just take it easy.
Best regards

[APOCALYPSE]

Hello@ Apocalypse
Take it easy. All of us know that all the tests in chess forums are considered as fun tests although we like them very much , consider them with great appreciation and respect. Also all of us know that the difference between strength of stockfish and all it’s derivatives is almost near the epsilon. All of them are very very strong and valuable. Also we know that fluctuation is the nature of all derivatives and non of them are stable as stockfish itself. For example we see one version of shashchess is very strong and wins all derivatives tournaments, then the next version is
Almost weak comparing with other derivatives. This fact is seen for all derivatives: Eman, Brainlearn, Hazard , SFpro and others. Also all of us know the value of authors and developers works, like you, Tanick, Anton and others. So, just take it easy.
Best regards

I am absolutely calm as a boa constrictor — I just said what I think and know about this.
Regards.