+1
Hazard Engines
Re: Hazard Engines
Test by Adrian
Hazard v4.1_avx2 vs. Brainlearn 26.5 AVX2
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: GM Test Book v3 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Brainlearn: nn-0000000000a0.nnue - Hazard and Brainlearn Experience on and Learning from 0
Book Settings:
1.Tournament UNCHECKED
2.Min games 3-35
3.Variety of play 215
4.Influence of learn 0
5.Learning strength 0
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0
1 Hazard v4.1_avx2 +1 +9/=413/-8 50.12% 215.5/430
2 Brainlearn 26.5 AVX2 -1 +8/=413/-9 49.88% 214.5/430
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/iah3o6th ... 8.pgn/file
Congratulations OrgZ! :sm73:
Hazard v4.1_avx2 vs. Brainlearn 26.5 AVX2
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: GM Test Book v3 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Brainlearn: nn-0000000000a0.nnue - Hazard and Brainlearn Experience on and Learning from 0
Book Settings:
1.Tournament UNCHECKED
2.Min games 3-35
3.Variety of play 215
4.Influence of learn 0
5.Learning strength 0
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0
1 Hazard v4.1_avx2 +1 +9/=413/-8 50.12% 215.5/430
2 Brainlearn 26.5 AVX2 -1 +8/=413/-9 49.88% 214.5/430
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/iah3o6th ... 8.pgn/file
Congratulations OrgZ! :sm73:
Re: Hazard Engines
Hi Orgs
This is the right way. Always let your engines to participate in other people tests and tournaments
too. Although you have your personal tests for your engine but never fear from others tournaments.Monitor you engines results in different situations. It is the best way for convincing chess fans about your works too. When they see the success of your engines in different tournaments, there will be no additional word to say besides appreciating. Unfortunately now a days we see some authors only do personal tests with unclear conditions. They want to convince chess fans and attract their trust by this wrong way. Some of them are doing even worse. They never publish any games of the personal tests. It is obvious that chess fans never trust to them and their works. Any way, we see your engines have great successes in different tournaments and sites. This is appreciated.congratulations.
Best regards
This is the right way. Always let your engines to participate in other people tests and tournaments
too. Although you have your personal tests for your engine but never fear from others tournaments.Monitor you engines results in different situations. It is the best way for convincing chess fans about your works too. When they see the success of your engines in different tournaments, there will be no additional word to say besides appreciating. Unfortunately now a days we see some authors only do personal tests with unclear conditions. They want to convince chess fans and attract their trust by this wrong way. Some of them are doing even worse. They never publish any games of the personal tests. It is obvious that chess fans never trust to them and their works. Any way, we see your engines have great successes in different tournaments and sites. This is appreciated.congratulations.
Best regards
Re: Hazard Engines
Totally agree with you Homayoun.
All the best to you and OrgZ.
All the best to you and OrgZ.
Re: Hazard Engines
Hello to you tooHomayoun wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 6:04 amHi Orgs
This is the right way. Always let your engines to participate in other people tests and tournaments
too. Although you have your personal tests for your engine but never fear from others tournaments.Monitor you engines results in different situations. It is the best way for convincing chess fans about your works too. When they see the success of your engines in different tournaments, there will be no additional word to say besides appreciating. Unfortunately now a days we see some authors only do personal tests with unclear conditions. They want to convince chess fans and attract their trust by this wrong way. Some of them are doing even worse. They never publish any games of the personal tests. It is obvious that chess fans never trust to them and their works. Any way, we see your engines have great successes in different tournaments and sites. This is appreciated.congratulations.
Best regards
I have no fear when it comes to tournaments Mr Homayoun, thats how am able to see how they perform in different conditions and hardware....as for personal tests i too somes don't paste games on the thread Ramz tests..... Due to laziness to upload on pixeldrain or when u want to use those games for my private books and not bcz of other reasons which i have seen from others... But sometimes i do paste games if you have seen
And i saw Sawfish 2TC did great on chess engine diary's latest tournament . For an engine dominated by an old stockfish code with 10-15 percent latest code is impressive, credit to dorsz
Greetings to you too Mr Zamchess stay well people
Re: Hazard Engines
Thanks OrgZ.OrgZ wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:36 amHello to you tooHomayoun wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 6:04 amHi Orgs
This is the right way. Always let your engines to participate in other people tests and tournaments
too. Although you have your personal tests for your engine but never fear from others tournaments.Monitor you engines results in different situations. It is the best way for convincing chess fans about your works too. When they see the success of your engines in different tournaments, there will be no additional word to say besides appreciating. Unfortunately now a days we see some authors only do personal tests with unclear conditions. They want to convince chess fans and attract their trust by this wrong way. Some of them are doing even worse. They never publish any games of the personal tests. It is obvious that chess fans never trust to them and their works. Any way, we see your engines have great successes in different tournaments and sites. This is appreciated.congratulations.
Best regards
I have no fear when it comes to tournaments Mr Homayoun, thats how am able to see how they perform in different conditions and hardware....as for personal tests i too somes don't paste games on the thread Ramz tests..... Due to laziness to upload on pixeldrain or when u want to use those games for my private books and not bcz of other reasons which i have seen from others... But sometimes i do paste games if you have seen
And i saw Sawfish 2TC did great on chess engine diary's latest tournament . For an engine dominated by an old stockfish code with 10-15 percent latest code is impressive, credit to dorsz
Greetings to you too Mr Zamchess stay well people
Yes , you always have professional behaviour. You , Anton and Dorsz always share your engines with the reliable testes in community like Chess engines diary,Mr. Sedat, Ghppn, Adrian Oliva and others to make their tests. This is a professional behaviour.I hope some others learn this from you.
Thanks and best regards