Yes..for example, via Raubfish SC, the current draw ratio is not so high: 88%OrgZ wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 8:10 pmyou are right. SF POLY is stronger Raubf just has a tendency to negate draws, i have that engine i know it very well.Sedat Canbaz wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:56 pmI like it, a good method...OrgZ wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 5:16 pmCorrect.
i gather games filter, host my own games with various engines and merge.
theres even a picture there that shows Hazard vs Raid games and a bin named 000.bin
there's 120.bin is the second book the first book is 2mb its a base line (its fully tuned its used to create different books), think of it as a backbone.111.bin, 112.bin and 114.bin that's the final book that you have. tested by SF POLY 110923X. as you can see am doing all this by my self.
I mean e.g running book matches on same PC
Anyhow, for better performance,
I'd try testings via Raubfish SC as well...
You may know,
SF POLY's playing style is not exactly same as Raubfish SC
Greetings
Where with rest engines (which are slightly stronger...) produce close to 98%
That means 10% draw difference...and this factor
Can make as serious influence over the results....
So...to be successful in current tour:
You have to switch to ....... engine ?)
Greetings