Kappatoo - kingliveson

Correspondence games between OpenChess members here...
kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: Kappatoo - kingliveson

Post by kingliveson »

PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Kappatoo
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:31 pm

Re: Kappatoo - kingliveson

Post by Kappatoo »



Sorry for the delayed reply. I offer a draw.
kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: Kappatoo - kingliveson

Post by kingliveson »


1/2-1/2
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: Kappatoo - kingliveson

Post by kingliveson »

Kappatoo wrote:

Sorry for the delayed reply. I offer a draw.
Thanks for the game. I am curious about move 40 though, that seemed like a blunder. If you are interested in another position, let me know.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Kappatoo
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:31 pm

Re: Kappatoo - kingliveson

Post by Kappatoo »

Thanks for the game!

Yes, it was a crude blunder and in a way I feel that I should apologize for it, since it completely disrupted the course of the game.
I managed to identify the source of the error: Qd2 was what I wanted to play after 38...Qe5 - without the check on e4 - with a winning position. After 38...Qe4 39.Kc1 Qe5, I had planned 40.Qb4, also with a winning position. When I saw your 39...Qe5, I somehow confused these lines and set up the wrong position in my analysis, and finally ended up sending the wrong move.

Concerning another game: If we do this, I should really start from a worse position for a change. I will get back to you after the holidays. By the way, happy holidays!
kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: Kappatoo - kingliveson

Post by kingliveson »

Kappatoo wrote:Thanks for the game!

Yes, it was a crude blunder and in a way I feel that I should apologize for it, since it completely disrupted the course of the game.
I managed to identify the source of the error: Qd2 was what I wanted to play after 38...Qe5 - without the check on e4 - with a winning position. After 38...Qe4 39.Kc1 Qe5, I had planned 40.Qb4, also with a winning position. When I saw your 39...Qe5, I somehow confused these lines and set up the wrong position in my analysis, and finally ended up sending the wrong move.

Concerning another game: If we do this, I should really start from a worse position for a change. I will get back to you after the holidays. By the way, happy holidays!
Happy New Year! Let me know when you are ready.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen
Post Reply