Again I quote this from memory. Again it seems that even superior engines take more than 1s (OK, sometimes they find it in 2 or 3) to realise some things. E.g., when post-analysing in MultiPV mode, my move would not make the top 3 right away, but after making it, the score would jump (not all my moves are the most trenchant, of course). Maybe king safety issues? If nothing else, the game might be of human interest.
And after a few checks, the White king made its way to g2.
I actually failed to realise that 21. Bg6 was threatening Qg4 with mate to follow, and just played it on feel. I don't like the whole idea with 11... Bg4, not just because the knight is trapped (it is rather inconvenient to hunt it down), but that 14. Ncb6 really ties Black up.
Another BB+ versus GNU Chess 5.07 game
Re: Another BB+ versus GNU Chess 5.07 game
This is true for all engines and for long periods of time, that's why analyzing with several engines is very effective (say, Rybka doesn't have the best move in her top 6 after analyzing every top move for +1 minute, Naum after 20 seconds suggests the best move that shocks Rybka after forcing the variations, etc.)BB+ wrote: it seems that even superior engines take more than 1s (OK, sometimes they find it in 2 or 3) to realise some things. E.g., when post-analysing in MultiPV mode, my move would not make the top 3 right away, but after making it, the score would jump