SedatChess
-
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: SedatChess
Breaking News (28.01.2025):
Today I realized to test many more engines which are close to 3800+, where
CorChess is CorChess, managed successfully to define his Champion title!!
But I admit that SF-PRO2 was a serious Champ candidate! but unfortunately
Lost but not due to strength or needed more luck etc. simply lost due not so
Stable..e.g there are 9 games lost on time by SF-PRO2..sad, we are in 2025
But..actually I'm doing my best such as increasing move overhead to 200.. but
APOCALYPSE's engine comes with poor settings e.g no way to increase..and
Just if again SF-PRO eng series will lost on time.I'll will not test them anymore..
Because 'stability' is most important part! I assume for your side too!? Btw,
SF PRO author is informed (in past) about over these instability issues, but
It seems he is not capable to fix the mentioned time management problems...
While I'm mentioning about time management, mostly of chess engines are
Are stable..no many time loses but some (including latest SF dev. series) play
Too fast..there is unbalanced TC issue.. such as half of time control not used..
Strange, right ? I am not a programmer, but according to my experience, min
80%-90% overall time should be used (in game play, in long moves matches)
However, I'm grateful from all authors since all these Top engines are for free!
Besides, no anyone's work is perfect. including mine.., even machines make
Mistake..Ah pardon, we've perfect fools who love to criticize others but theirs
Work is so limited and it's not worth, it will be waste of time to talk more over..
Oh friends that's all for now..see you later and have fun with latest results !)
SCCT LVI's GRAND Champion CorChess - Congratulations to I. Ivec & SF team!
FOR FINAL STANDINGS / GAMES:
https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... t-nn-cs-56
Best,
Sedat
Today I realized to test many more engines which are close to 3800+, where
CorChess is CorChess, managed successfully to define his Champion title!!
But I admit that SF-PRO2 was a serious Champ candidate! but unfortunately
Lost but not due to strength or needed more luck etc. simply lost due not so
Stable..e.g there are 9 games lost on time by SF-PRO2..sad, we are in 2025
But..actually I'm doing my best such as increasing move overhead to 200.. but
APOCALYPSE's engine comes with poor settings e.g no way to increase..and
Just if again SF-PRO eng series will lost on time.I'll will not test them anymore..
Because 'stability' is most important part! I assume for your side too!? Btw,
SF PRO author is informed (in past) about over these instability issues, but
It seems he is not capable to fix the mentioned time management problems...
While I'm mentioning about time management, mostly of chess engines are
Are stable..no many time loses but some (including latest SF dev. series) play
Too fast..there is unbalanced TC issue.. such as half of time control not used..
Strange, right ? I am not a programmer, but according to my experience, min
80%-90% overall time should be used (in game play, in long moves matches)
However, I'm grateful from all authors since all these Top engines are for free!
Besides, no anyone's work is perfect. including mine.., even machines make
Mistake..Ah pardon, we've perfect fools who love to criticize others but theirs
Work is so limited and it's not worth, it will be waste of time to talk more over..
Oh friends that's all for now..see you later and have fun with latest results !)
SCCT LVI's GRAND Champion CorChess - Congratulations to I. Ivec & SF team!
FOR FINAL STANDINGS / GAMES:
https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... t-nn-cs-56
Best,
Sedat
Re: SedatChess
Thank you very much Sedat !
- APOCALYPSE
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:37 am
- Contact:
Re: SedatChess
Thank you Sedat for your tournaments!Sedat Canbaz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:56 pmBreaking News (28.01.2025):
Today I realized to test many more engines which are close to 3800+, where
CorChess is CorChess, managed successfully to define his Champion title!!
But I admit that SF-PRO2 was a serious Champ candidate! but unfortunately
Lost but not due to strength or needed more luck etc. simply lost due not so
Stable..e.g there are 9 games lost on time by SF-PRO2..sad, we are in 2025
But..actually I'm doing my best such as increasing move overhead to 200.. but
APOCALYPSE's engine comes with poor settings e.g no way to increase..and
Just if again SF-PRO eng series will lost on time.I'll will not test them anymore..
Because 'stability' is most important part! I assume for your side too!? Btw,
SF PRO author is informed (in past) about over these instability issues, but
It seems he is not capable to fix the mentioned time management problems...
While I'm mentioning about time management, mostly of chess engines are
Are stable..no many time loses but some (including latest SF dev. series) play
Too fast..there is unbalanced TC issue.. such as half of time control not used..
Strange, right ? I am not a programmer, but according to my experience, min
80%-90% overall time should be used (in game play, in long moves matches)
However, I'm grateful from all authors since all these Top engines are for free!
Besides, no anyone's work is perfect. including mine.., even machines make
Mistake..Ah pardon, we've perfect fools who love to criticize others but theirs
Work is so limited and it's not worth, it will be waste of time to talk more over..
Oh friends that's all for now..see you later and have fun with latest results !)
SCCT LVI's GRAND Champion CorChess - Congratulations to I. Ivec & SF team!
FOR FINAL STANDINGS / GAMES:
https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... t-nn-cs-56
Best,
Sedat
I'll see what adjustments can be made to the engine.
Keep an eye on the mail
-
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: SedatChess
Dear Chess Friends,
You are welcome and thanks for your interest )
Greetings
You are welcome and thanks for your interest )
Greetings
Re: SedatChess
Great tour Sedat, thank you so much!
-
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: SedatChess
Not at all.. it is my pleasure..)
And how nice to see my good chess friends here..
Thank you too )
And how nice to see my good chess friends here..
Thank you too )
-
- Posts: 2070
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: SedatChess
UPDATE
An Unofficial test via newer SF-PRO2 280125 vers.
Normally the CS is over.. but I ran this quick beta test,
Just to help to SF PRO 's author...because previous SF PRO
Series were not so stable ( on my tournament machine...)
And I have good news (in 2000 games per player):
SF-PRO2 280125 has no any game to be lost on time!
My congratulations to SF PRO's author as well !
Note also that,
Current SF-PRO2 280125 has already move overhead option,
So played via 200, and as we see, it seems all stable...
Regarding latest SF-PRO's performance (e.g as 8th rank),
Not sure about you, but I'm satisfied..you may know to be
In Top 10 ranks, not so many engines managed to do that..!
But interesting to point out also that,
Older SF-PRO2 250125 (despite on 9 time loses), scored better!
And I wonder much, how is this possible ?)
Btw, via latest update,
Contact 10 SE is 2nd rank.. great too !
GAMES:
https://pixeldrain.com/u/hafeSgrn
Note: Same conditions are used/played as:
https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... t-nn-cs-56
Greetings
An Unofficial test via newer SF-PRO2 280125 vers.
Normally the CS is over.. but I ran this quick beta test,
Just to help to SF PRO 's author...because previous SF PRO
Series were not so stable ( on my tournament machine...)
And I have good news (in 2000 games per player):
SF-PRO2 280125 has no any game to be lost on time!
My congratulations to SF PRO's author as well !
Note also that,
Current SF-PRO2 280125 has already move overhead option,
So played via 200, and as we see, it seems all stable...
Regarding latest SF-PRO's performance (e.g as 8th rank),
Not sure about you, but I'm satisfied..you may know to be
In Top 10 ranks, not so many engines managed to do that..!
But interesting to point out also that,
Older SF-PRO2 250125 (despite on 9 time loses), scored better!
And I wonder much, how is this possible ?)
Btw, via latest update,
Contact 10 SE is 2nd rank.. great too !
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Corchess 190125 3819 3 3 3666 52% 3805 89%
2 Contact 10 SE 3818 3 4 3666 52% 3805 89%
3 SF-PRO2 250125 3817 5 5 1900 52% 3806 89%
4 Killfish 021224 3815 4 4 3400 51% 3806 90%
5 Kookaburra 3 3815 4 4 3666 52% 3805 88%
6 Stockfish 17 3814 5 5 1900 51% 3806 90%
7 SF-PB 221124 3813 4 4 3666 51% 3804 89%
8 SF-PRO2 280125 3812 5 5 2000 51% 3806 90%
9 Brainlearn 30 3811 4 4 3666 51% 3805 89%
10 SpecTral v2 3810 5 5 1900 51% 3806 90%
11 Solidor 180924 3810 5 5 1900 51% 3806 89%
12 Private 19Sf 3809 5 5 1900 50% 3806 90%
13 Sun 15 3809 5 5 2100 51% 3805 88%
14 Tactical Titan 3807 5 5 1900 50% 3806 88%
15 ShashChess 37 3807 5 5 1900 50% 3806 89%
16 Stockfish 190125 3807 5 5 2016 50% 3805 88%
17 Stockfish 260125 3806 5 5 1900 50% 3806 89%
18 Magic Knight 3806 5 5 1900 50% 3806 89%
19 C-Dragon v3 3806 5 5 1900 50% 3806 90%
20 SF-POLY 210924a 3806 5 5 1900 50% 3806 91%
21 Fidelio 17 3806 5 5 1900 50% 3806 90%
22 Artemis 7 TR 3805 5 5 1900 50% 3806 88%
23 Steel Fighter 3 3805 5 5 1900 50% 3806 89%
24 DarkSeid 5.3 3805 5 5 2216 50% 3805 88%
25 Polyfish 140124 3805 5 5 1900 50% 3806 88%
26 Incognito 8.2 3805 5 5 1900 50% 3806 90%
27 Artemis 6 TR 3804 5 5 2016 50% 3805 88%
28 Eman 9.90 3803 5 5 1900 50% 3806 87%
29 Deep Ripper 3803 5 5 1900 50% 3806 87%
30 Dark SisTer v2 3803 5 5 2216 50% 3805 89%
31 Troubadour 1.5 3803 5 5 2100 50% 3805 90%
32 SF-PB 280924 SC 3803 5 5 1900 50% 3806 89%
33 JigSaw v5.9 3802 5 5 1900 49% 3806 88%
34 Aoda 17 3801 5 5 1900 49% 3806 89%
35 DeepBlue 0524 3801 5 5 1900 49% 3806 89%
36 SF-Ivec 180125 3800 5 5 2100 49% 3805 89%
37 RapTora 3.0 3800 5 5 1900 49% 3806 88%
38 Beast M 010125 3800 5 5 2216 49% 3805 87%
39 Sailfish 4.0 3800 5 5 1900 49% 3806 88%
40 Raid 36 TR 3799 5 5 1900 49% 3806 90%
41 Marauders 4 3798 5 5 1900 49% 3806 89%
42 HypnoS++ 1.01 3796 5 5 2166 49% 3805 88%
43 SFNNv6 16.1 3795 5 5 1900 48% 3807 86%
44 SF-PRO 311224 3788 5 5 2016 47% 3806 85%
45 JudaS++ 1.01 3784 4 4 2216 47% 3807 85%
46 Cool Iris 13.97 3782 5 5 1600 46% 3805 85%
https://pixeldrain.com/u/hafeSgrn
Note: Same conditions are used/played as:
https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... t-nn-cs-56
Greetings
Re: SedatChess
I entered the tour and games to Deepseek and this is what it found, however what surprised me is that it does not know that BrainLearn and SpecTral handle Q-Learning, outstanding!
Key Findings
Extreme competitiveness:
Only 37 Elo points separate 1st (Corchess 190125: 3819) and 46th (Cool Iris 13.97: 3782).
Minimal differences (1-2 points) between leaders reflect technical parity.
Predominant tables:
>85% draws (up to 91% in SF-POLY 210924a), indicating conservative play and risk avoidance.
Stockfish domain:
7 of the top 20 are Stockfish variants (ex: SF-PRO2, SF-PB).
Minor updates (e.g. dev 16 and dev 17 in Stockfish) impact ±1 Elo point.
Reliability by game volume:
Engines with >3000 games have reduced error margins (±3-4 vs. ±5 in <2000 games).
Featured Patterns
Draws not correlated with Elo: Leading engines do not always have the highest rates (ex: Corchess 190125: 89% vs. SF-POLY 210924a: 91%).
Competent alternative engines: Brainlearn 30 (9th) and SpecTral v2 (10th) stand out with innovative approaches.
Conclusions
Microscopic innovation: Differences of 1-2 points require hyper-precise adjustments in algorithms.
Consistency > Risk: Maximizing positional advantages (pawn structure, center control) is key in the face of high draw rates.
Niche Specialization: Engines like Killfish 021224 (4th) can lead in specific areas (ending, tactics).
Best regards, Sedat!
Key Findings
Extreme competitiveness:
Only 37 Elo points separate 1st (Corchess 190125: 3819) and 46th (Cool Iris 13.97: 3782).
Minimal differences (1-2 points) between leaders reflect technical parity.
Predominant tables:
>85% draws (up to 91% in SF-POLY 210924a), indicating conservative play and risk avoidance.
Stockfish domain:
7 of the top 20 are Stockfish variants (ex: SF-PRO2, SF-PB).
Minor updates (e.g. dev 16 and dev 17 in Stockfish) impact ±1 Elo point.
Reliability by game volume:
Engines with >3000 games have reduced error margins (±3-4 vs. ±5 in <2000 games).
Featured Patterns
Draws not correlated with Elo: Leading engines do not always have the highest rates (ex: Corchess 190125: 89% vs. SF-POLY 210924a: 91%).
Competent alternative engines: Brainlearn 30 (9th) and SpecTral v2 (10th) stand out with innovative approaches.
Conclusions
Microscopic innovation: Differences of 1-2 points require hyper-precise adjustments in algorithms.
Consistency > Risk: Maximizing positional advantages (pawn structure, center control) is key in the face of high draw rates.
Niche Specialization: Engines like Killfish 021224 (4th) can lead in specific areas (ending, tactics).
Best regards, Sedat!