Hello there )
1st of all,
SCCT B/N CS XXXIII salutes all BIN + CTG Book Authors !)
And this time, I've good news for CTG Book Authors too,
Because exc BIN, CTG books are already acceptable too!
And I wish to say thanks to all BIN + CTG programmers and
Special thanks to Mr. Tanick Ramz, for creating a powerful,
Stable, small in size etc.actually as other important thing,
SF-CTG 150724 is on same strength level as SF-PB 150724,
Moreover SF-CTG capable to use CTG + BIN book formats!
By the way, after quick checking:
So far the tested CTG books are preferred to play the
Green lines... plus CTG books were out when defeats!
This is really great..e.g some time ago, the defeats
Were used to play...and that was playing as bad role,
Where was leading to BIG disadvantage opening start..
But nowadays, it seems all right...
But note also that,
Cutechess's CTG tests are not same as under Fritz!
For examples, if no green line, then the engine is
Out of book, due to CTG engine strictly follows ıts
Book settings, but under Fritz: it continues to play..
Sure in case of disabling 'Only Green' then all the
Opening moves are preferring to be played out...
And as other main difference between both GUIs is that
Under Cutechess: CTG books are not capable to learn..
But this is also true, nowadays '
Learning' is not much
Effictive or important..e.g if strong opening lines, then
The Top Engines + Evalfile make very rarely mistake/s!
Exc. under handicapped cond. such as via old-dated slow
Hardware..or simply if using bad (weak) openings etc.
Besides, let's say that even if we will use weak engines or
Old hardware or weak (bad) opening etc. again and again
'Learning' is not so good idea..sure I refer for next entries,
Otherwise..the matches will be not fair at all, right ?
And if you going to ask,
What is main diff. between both book formats?
If based on same data, CTG is bigger in size,
But CTG is much easier to be tuned.. than BIN!
But for the Top Book Makers: they are 'good' in
Every format..at least the tours confirm this..and
Not only now..I refer from the past to the present!
And here are the latest new 'strength' results:
As we see... after serious data (1000 games),
No any Elo difference between both versions!
Because Balsa openings used...e.g via weaker
Opening suite..may appear some error margin..
Code: Select all
1 SF-PB 150724 +19/-18/=963 50.05% 500.5/1000
2 SF-CTG 150724 +18/-19/=963 49.95% 499.5/1000
GAMES:
https://mega.nz/file/b15VDSiT#0kAYhln8H ... lZYlMskSeE
Conditions:
2x Epyc 7B12, CuteChess, 1 Core, Ponder OFF, 30s+06s, 64 MB Hash, 4-MEN
As final words,
In ongoing XXXIII CS, I already started testing CTG
Opening books as well..!! yes.. now is your turn !)
In next days, I hope to see BIN + CTG releases too,
Thanks in advance..
Greetings )