What kind of success are you having with this? I expected a log to be produced from my use with this engine analyzing positions but none was created. What have I misunderstood? I had mode set to 0 and I created the logs directory in case that was the problem...
Fixed: http://talkchess.com/forum ...
Search found 127 matches
- Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:38 am
- Forum: Engines, GUIs, Books and Platforms
- Topic: NeuroStock 2.0.1 and NeuroGrape 1.1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2582
- Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:36 pm
- Forum: Engines, GUIs, Books and Platforms
- Topic: NeuroStock 2.0.1 and NeuroGrape 1.1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2582
Re: NeuroStock 2.0.1 and NeuroGrape 1.1
What kind of success are you having with this? I expected a log to be produced from my use with this engine analyzing positions but none was created. What have I misunderstood? I had mode set to 0 and I created the logs directory in case that was the problem...
- Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:10 am
- Forum: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Endgame testing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3770
Re: Endgame testing
I used the -repeat switch for the positions to be repeated with colors swapped, but apparently cutechess ignores this if the tournament is a round robin. Is this the expected behavior?
I guess it's finally time to post my first message on this board. Cutechess-cli does indeed ignore the "-repeat ...
I guess it's finally time to post my first message on this board. Cutechess-cli does indeed ignore the "-repeat ...
- Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:13 pm
- Forum: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Endgame testing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3770
Re: Endgame testing
This is very interesting as I thought the order would've been:
1. Houdini
2. Critter
3. Rybka
4. Komodo
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Rybka 4.1 11 17 17 553 53% -4 58%
2 Houdini 2.0c 4 17 17 550 51% -1 65%
3 Komodo 3 -2 17 17 551 50% 1 60%
4 Critter 1.4 -13 17 17 552 47 ...
1. Houdini
2. Critter
3. Rybka
4. Komodo
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Rybka 4.1 11 17 17 553 53% -4 58%
2 Houdini 2.0c 4 17 17 550 51% -1 65%
3 Komodo 3 -2 17 17 551 50% 1 60%
4 Critter 1.4 -13 17 17 552 47 ...
- Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:39 am
- Forum: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Endgame testing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3770
Re: Endgame testing
My earlier testing had Houdini at the top. Who knows what it will look like with another 600 (or more) games added on Friday.kingliveson wrote:This is very interesting as I thought the order would've been:
1. Houdini
2. Critter
3. Rybka
4. Komodo
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:09 pm
- Forum: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Endgame testing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3770
Endgame testing
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Rybka 4.1 16 23 23 300 54% -5 56%
2 Komodo 3 0 23 23 300 50% 0 59%
3 Houdini 2.0c -3 22 22 300 49% 1 64%
4 Critter 1.4 -13 23 23 300 47% 4 60%
threads: 1
ponder: off
time control: 2/4"
64-bit and SSE4.2 versions when available
Nalimov and ...
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:07 am
- Forum: General Topics
- Topic: These people are immune to rational thought!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2387
Re: These people are immune to rational thought!
I do have to like the CPW page on Rolf, particularly the inventive title "computer chess forum activist". :)
I followed the link and some of the rgcc links as well. Apparently Bob and Rolf have been rehashing the same argument re the Deep Blue match of '97 for over a decade. Is it stamina or ...
I followed the link and some of the rgcc links as well. Apparently Bob and Rolf have been rehashing the same argument re the Deep Blue match of '97 for over a decade. Is it stamina or ...
- Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:36 am
- Forum: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Vas Speaks in Tongues
- Replies: 49
- Views: 19561
Re: Vas Speaks in Tongues
I laughed my ass off when I saw claims that Vas has created a whole new programming language with Rybka in other threads, but now he speaks in tongues ! Who knew using simple defines could spawn such spirituality…and an effectively higher level proprietary language.
More gibberish from Trotsky/Ed ...
More gibberish from Trotsky/Ed ...
- Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:31 am
- Forum: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Compiling Stockfish MSVS 2010
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3897
Re: Compiling Stockfish MSVS 2010
Anyone have a working makefile for Stockfish under MS Visual Studio 2010? Any special options I should be using?
I compiled Stockfish 1.8 at one time, but I lost the makefile I used.
Stockfish is pretty easy to make at the command line with the MS compiler.
cl /Festockfish /Ox /DNDEBUG /DIS ...
I compiled Stockfish 1.8 at one time, but I lost the makefile I used.
Stockfish is pretty easy to make at the command line with the MS compiler.
cl /Festockfish /Ox /DNDEBUG /DIS ...
- Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:03 pm
- Forum: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: CLOP and cluster testing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1706
Re: CLOP and cluster testing
Has anyone put Remi's new optimization tool to use on a cluster yet? Bob? If so, what kind of improvements are you seeing?
On a cluster with N identical computers testing time is divided by N.
Thanks for the input. I'd be very curios to see how CLOP performs versus Bob's manual single-variable ...
On a cluster with N identical computers testing time is divided by N.
Thanks for the input. I'd be very curios to see how CLOP performs versus Bob's manual single-variable ...