orgfert wrote:

thorstenczub wrote:i don't know what you mean. da vinci code ? whats this ? a book ?

I dare not tell you or you will believe it is also true.

Oh yeah, he will.

Given that every reasonable chess program has all (or almost all) the ingredients as mentioned in the Zach & BB documents (mine certainly has all) makes a comparison hardly possible. Much of what's described in the document I either have done similar (and a lot earlier than good old Fabien :lol ...

What will you say when the FSF finds Vas guilty of copyright infringement??? You sure don't have any problem slamming your peers to protect one dubious programmer. What the hell Ed?
Hey Terry, hope you are well.

Regarding the question, what will you say when the FSF frees Vas of guilt?

Pretty ...

Given that every reasonable chess program has all (or almost all) the ingredients as mentioned in the Zach & BB documents (mine certainly has all) makes a comparison hardly possible. Much of what's described in the document I either have done similar (and a lot earlier than good old Fabien :lol ...

Have not seen a single piece of evidence from Ed. Wonder why?

Cause I have nothing to add nor to distract.

What's causing the huge branch factor difference between 23.2 and 23.3 ?

Whatever the answer, it's not your original idea. You heard it from someone. And that person heard it from another ...

CarstenL wrote:Talkchess down again.

Wether http://74.220.23.57/forum/index.php
nor http://www.talkchess.com/forum/index.php
goes here

It's up and running now.

You think I'm kidding? You think it's a joke?

I've no idea why you waste my time. If you don't understand my reply to Whittington it's your inadequate reading skills.

You only have yourself to blame.

Really? Can you guys take this to private messages or something? I'm pretty sure even in ...

Sean Evans wrote:

Terry McCracken wrote:

Sean Evans wrote:

Terry McCracken wrote: Sean if you want to get into an argument with me, how about in court? You're Canadian, it shouldn't be too hard to sue you in a civil case. Stalking, harassment, on the internet is illegal.

You think I'm kidding? You think it's a joke?

Sean if you want to get into an argument with me, how about in court? You're Canadian, it shouldn't be too hard to sue you in a civil case. Stalking, harassment, on the internet is illegal.

:D


You think I'm kidding? You think it's a joke?

I've no idea why you waste my time. If you don't ...

Sean are you an unintelligent illiterate?

I see, so if I am reading your posts and forming response sentences with appropriate grammar does that not defeat your illiterate argument?

This has nothing to do with you but psychopaths on the internet jump in with both feet and there are several it ...