houdini 4 is out now
http://www.cruxis.com/chess/houdini.htm

+50 ELO from houdini 3

You can figure these out because 100 games with 76 draws you only need one other number to figure the totals.
I think it would be better to just print the whole line, because obviously people can be confused by it.
By the way, it takes thousands of games when the engines are close to really know ...

houdini 3 pro x64
809 won 9 games out of 100
819 won 15 games out of 100
76 games were draws

but the newest compiles (stockfish_13090211_x64 ) just get better. stockfish is the best

strong engine, beats houdini easily at blitz. i tested the new compile released today at 1 second per move 100 games no books or tablebases

stockfish_13081809_x64_modern = 9
-vs-
stockfish_13082819_x64_modern = 15
draws = 76

Yes I have PGN files for those games. The time setting is 5 seconds per move, no game time limit. Using 64bit and good hardware. After 50 more games Houdini took a clear lead.

IvanHoe 47c GH x64/POPCNT
http://www.mediafire.com/?8m83f51lfzccnrx

After about 15 games it's tied with Houdini 1.5a. Pretty considerable improvement IMO.

xshat wrote:Excellent. Will test 50 games of Firebird 2.1 against Houdini 1.5a.

Good ELO improvement.

Tested 50 games, 5 seconds per move
Houdini won 34 games, Fire 2.1 won 16 games.

Excellent. Will test 50 games of Firebird 2.1 against Houdini 1.5a.

Good ELO improvement.

he tried to sell plagerised / cloned engines dear

he FALSLY claimed firebird as "THE worlds strongest engine " , slapping the Decemberists in the face

yes hes very honest and trustworthy
That is such fake propaganda that I'm laughing. Kranium's claim was not false. Firebird WAS the strongest ...

he tried to sell plagerised / cloned engines dear

he FALSLY claimed firebird as "THE worlds strongest engine " , slapping the Decemberists in the face

yes hes very honest and trustworthy
That is such fake propaganda that I'm laughing. Kranium's claim was not false. Firebird WAS the strongest ...