I am trying to collect Stockfish nodes per second data from the computer chess community and I hope to get plenty of volunteers. The information will be useful for comparing computer chess results between computers.

I have created a package that can be downloaded at http://www.mediafire.com/file ...

lucasart wrote:Is TCEC over ?

Nobody seems to know. Nelson and I have not heard anything from Martin since February, and I do not know of anybody else who has either.

Interesting. I have been conducting "neoclassical" chess matches for years and have thought it could be applied to human play. It is a pity that I never made the step to claim intellectual property rights like this "inventor"

Hi! It is always good to see a new engine author. There are several experienced authors who check into this forum from time to time who can answer your questions. Other places where engine authors congregate are Computer Chess Club and Winboard forum . Also, I have compiled a list of computer chess ...

User923005 wrote:How will we view game collections?
How will we download games?

Click the File tab, then Archive mode:




Then you can navigate and download the games:

Today I toyed around with clop and tune Aggressiveness and Space on Deiban7x64 but things did not work out as expected.

Here a description of the things I did :
I first downloaded latest cutechess and stockfish from github and clop from Remis site and compiled .I compiled clop using python2.7 ...

Has anyone had a problem with running Gull 2.2 or Gull 2.3 under linux+Wine with the hash set to 1024 MB or more? At 1024 MB, the speed is approximately 15 kns on my computer as opposed to approximately 1500 kns when the hash is less than 1000MB . Also, when the hash is set at 2048 MB, Gull becomes ...

Cool! I just added the link to the YouTube videos to the "Chess Programming Resources" page at my blog.

These games don't come from different contributors. They are from CCRL 40/40 rating pool.

They do come from different contributors and are compiled into a single rating list. These contributors use different hardware. Hence there's a systematic error in addition to the statistical error ...

Sorry for interviening again in this thread (promissed I wouldn't). But I really need to clarify a couple of points


error bars aside : H3 is above H3 Tactical in CCRL 40/40 and CCRL 40/4. For example, I see H3 = H3 Tactical + 40 elo on CCRL 40/40, after 53 games for H3 tactical and 995 for H3 ...